Pay attention to the people getting new opportunities and advancing their careers.
Don't look at them as competition. Make them your friends.
Instead of asking for favors, find ways to support them and celebrate their successes.
I spent the last 13 years building a career at T-Mobile.
It changed my life, and tomorrow is my last day.
Here are 11 rules I learned to get you promoted and help you win at life:
Pay attention to the people getting new opportunities and advancing their careers.
Don't look at them as competition. Make them your friends.
Instead of asking for favors, find ways to support them and celebrate their successes.
Great leaders start as great teammates.
Look for ways to enrich the people on your team. Be the person who is always ready to help others get better.
You never know who is watching or the impact you will make on another person.
You need people on your side who will advocate for you when important decisions are being made.
Do not wait for people to pick you out of the crowd. This doesn't work.
Find opportunities to share your success and ask for feedback to help you grow.
The more responsibility you have, the more stressful your job can become.
Find productive ways to manage your stress so you can be at your best for your team.
You will never get a new job or client if you look overwhelmed with your current work.
Realize you are on a different journey than the people around you.
Comparing yourself to others is a path to being miserable.
Winners focus on winning. Losers focus on winners.
This is the easiest way to build trust and stand out as someone reliable.
Don't wait for people to follow up with you.
Make sure following through on commitments becomes part of your brand.
It will show people you are ready for more.
People who focus on strengths see themselves differently, their future differently, and others differently.
Focusing on the value of the people around you is a simple way to encourage them to use their strengths more often.
As you navigate your career and business, make sure you look at options that make sense for you.
Think about where you want to be in 5-10 years when deciding your next step.
Sometimes a step to the side, or slight pivot, is the right move.
Be the change you want to see in others.
If you aren't doing this, you are likely coming across as superficial.
All the networking and relationship building will be a waste of time if you can't deliver when it is time.
Get used to saying yes to challenges and opportunities--regardless of how big or small.
Saying no once can mean not getting a second chance.
These stretch opportunities are a great way to develop new skills and expand your network in a meaningful way.
I’m posting at least two threads focused on positivity and leadership every week. Hit the follow button and stay in touch >> @MrJacobEspi
I spent the last 13 years building a career at T-Mobile.
— \u2615\ufe0f Jacob Espinoza (@MrJacobEspi) October 28, 2021
It changed my life, and tomorrow is my last day.
Here are 11 rules I learned to get you promoted and help you win at life:
@CallieField @jgebing @tomjyang @RachRo03 @blueprintTMO @JAnders328 @candymitchell06 @TarashaWright @slwoodCO @Drew_Williams00 @RolandFinch7 @jlongoria21 and so many others.
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the
chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the
chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?