More from MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER
Probability towards 4.618% and beyond..
#Possibility
#LTI -4145
— MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) July 14, 2021
Near term base Case (4024)
Look for 4.618% and 6.857%
Long term perspective Fibonacci extension shown in chart. #Perspective pic.twitter.com/Pyl0aGYIuS
Objective is to move higher towards
3.618% - 4.236% and 4.618%
#Probability
#IEX
— MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) April 20, 2021
On sustain rise above 347 upside shown in chart up to 4.618%(521)
And 6.857%(718).
View valid till 233 not violated. @UdayJad39389920 pic.twitter.com/I2MoPlwXRW
#ASIANPAINT-2931
— Waves_Perception(Dinesh Patel) \u092e\u0948\u0902Schedule Tribe) (@idineshptl) March 3, 2022
Trend down.
Weekly chart. Fibonacci retracement level shown in chart.
Near term 0.236% and 0.382% Fibonacci retracement level likely to be tested.#Perspective pic.twitter.com/cWJ0qaqDhK
What a beautiful picture
#Wow
एक कलर #लाल भी है
More from Kotakbank
Midway resistances held up strong.
Once these are breached, It is poised for more towards 1950 followed by 2000.
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus https://t.co/kswtnvjQM8
#KOTAKBANK
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) August 8, 2021
In daily; Trendline breakout along with price volume action.
Resistances midway at 1812.70 and 1856.75.
Once these are breached, It is poised for more towards 1950 followed by 2000.
In weekly as well; Setup looks quite bullish. #StockMarket #StocksToTrade pic.twitter.com/vfIjR7MuCE
You May Also Like
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.