One of the fastest growing cement company JKCEMENT is expanding capacities by nearly 50% by FY24 & are also venturing into value added products such as Wood Amore and RepairMaxX.
JKCEMENT is also India's largest white cement and Wall Putty producer.
More from Saket Reddy
Plotting sales CAGR for few gems in #chemicals, #pharma and #FMCG
— jeevan patwa (@jeevanpatwa) July 14, 2021
Majority has 20Y CAGR > 10Y > 5Y => growth is decelerating as base becomes big...
only outlier being #Deepaknitrate where
20Y CAGR < 10Y < 5Y => accelerating growth... pic.twitter.com/ewpFeKmxQo
Double Top Buy above 2233.36 daily close on 1% Box size chart. https://t.co/Grtz9Pi3vU
MINDTREE
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) December 22, 2020
The company is an international information technology consulting and implementation organisation that delivers business solutions through global software development.
DTB above 1619.22 daily close on 3% box size chart, DTB active on 1% chart. https://t.co/dhQmouQ9Wt pic.twitter.com/g8Rgz7fA0A
Double Top Buy triggered above 459.17 (2295 Pre Split) daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/0jUBx6hKMI
KPRMILL
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) September 3, 2021
Double Top Buy & T20 Pattern - Bullish above 2051.18 daily close on 3% Box Size chart. https://t.co/bJgLA1BGuv pic.twitter.com/xpTKy6vnBT
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?