#INDIAMART -7230
Stock price already attained 6.857% and corrected. Now again trying to move above 4.618%(7278)
If sustain above this than it may again cross recent ATH. And move higher towards each Fibonacci extension.
(Base case 6755)
#Probability

More from MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER
Either entry only above 1600 or let it
correct towards 987...
#Update
#CDSL -1050
— MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) July 9, 2021
Now above 2.618% and objective is to move higher towards 3.618%
4.236% and 4.618%....
What will Drag lower this stock price \U0001f602 ?
Only if you can sell your holding
Means Verticle rise ?
Than why it decline from (486-180.)#Observation #Perspective pic.twitter.com/evxYOjH8Qv
Probability towards 4.618% and beyond..
#Possibility
#LTI -4145
— MaRkET WaVES (DINESH PATEL ) Stock Market FARMER (@idineshptl) July 14, 2021
Near term base Case (4024)
Look for 4.618% and 6.857%
Long term perspective Fibonacci extension shown in chart. #Perspective pic.twitter.com/Pyl0aGYIuS
More from Indiamart

Good morning & thank you everyone for ur wishes & blessings\U0001f64f
— Nirav S. Karia (@caniravkaria) June 19, 2021
Feeling better now as took Dolo 650 but my hand is paining a lot. (huge consumption of Dolo 650 which is manufactured by Micro Labs Ltd unlisted\U0001f600).
But one mentioned in image is really worth studying \U0001f4da\U0001f4d6 ahead \U0001f64f https://t.co/yyrkNyRGAx pic.twitter.com/MijZmCXPMQ
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".