Categories For later read

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
Here the big people you requested. Now delete your tweets:

1. Haafidh Ibn Hajr said, “I asked my Shaikh Siraaj ud deen al-Balqayaanee about Ibn Arabee and he replied quickly he is kaafir (disbeliever)”{Leesaan ul-Meezaan(4/319), another edn (5/213),


…Tambiyyatul-Ghabee Ilaa Takfeer Ibn Arabee (pg.159)}

2. Muhaddith Baqaa’ee wrote our teacher Haafidh Ibn Hajr and another man called Ibn al-Ameen had a mubaahilah concerning Ibn Arabee. The man said, “If Ibn Arabee is upon misguidance then curse me.”

Haafidh Ibn Hajr said, “Oh Allaah if Ibn Arabee is upon guidance then curse me.” After a few months the man became blind and died during the night.
{Tambiyyatul-Ghabee (pg.136-137)}

3. Haafidh Ibn Daqeeq al-Eed asked Abu Muhammad Izz ud deen Abdul Azeez bin Abdus Salaam as-Silmee ad-Damashqee (660H) about Ibn Arabee and he replied, “Dirty, liar and far from the truth, he opined time was old and he did not consider other peoples private parts to be…

…haraam.”
{al-Wafaa Bal-Wafyaat (4/125) with an authentic chain, Tambiyyatul-Ghabee (pg.138)}
FEEL THE HEAT! It's the August 2020 WrestleWipe thread!

Yes! Hello! Welcome! In this thread we'll be going through all the news, drama, bullshit and petty squabbles that made professional wrestling the HOT TOPIC on our timelines.

Please read on...

PLUGS:

My podcast reviewing old indie wrestling tournaments is now live! Listen, subscribe & relive the glory years of independent wrestling.

Hotdogs & Handshakes (@HotdogHandshake):
https://t.co/GOcKFZ84gd

Also, visit https://t.co/3Vo4UvzSAf for more recaps & reviews.

If you need a catch up, here's the July thread. You can also find it, and all the other montly recaps, on Wrestle Wipe dot


Couple of things before I get started;

1. Apologies in advance for any formatting errors. These are big, media-filled threads and the app I use to create them is still fairly new and in constant development.

2. As is most likely the case going forward with these threads, there will be some references to Speaking Out so please use this part as a trigger warning. It won't be as much as June or July, but just please bare that in mind when reading on.

Now let's get onto the thread!
This whole thread.

It has made me think through multiple conflicts I have had at work and how "real talk" basically shuts down management.


Like when I was drowning in work, asking for help, and my boss asked me point blank if I wanted to quit and why didn't I ask for help.

I showed her the emails and call logs where I did.

She shut down and walked away.

Or the time a project was going off the rails and I asked my team lead for help.

I explained everything I did so far and was looking for direction on what else to do.

And he said, "I don't want this time to be just you complaining."

So I stopped telling him anything negative.
I’m retweeting this one not because I agree with it, but because I want to emphasize that all of this is so speculative. What does the exclusion of the president’s inability to pardon in cases of impeachment mean?


Is it only limited when the president is impeached and removed? Clinton’s pardons were allowed to stand, after he was impeached by the House—but the impeachment cause was so trivial—& they were also unrelated to the causes of his impeachment.

I actually think that allowing Clinton to grant pardons after impeachment was a big mistake, one that went against the intention of the Constitution, & one that helped to create the current mess. But that narrow precedent stands. What about the longer history & larger question?

After impeachment, President Johnson gave at least two pardons but they were reversed by President Grant immediately afterwards. How many did he give once impeached? Can other historians pipe in?

The revised edition of Joseph Story’s textbook of constitutional interpretation, published in 1868, said that presidents cannot pardon after impeachment as such a power “might become ... a protection against political offenses...the party accused might be acting under ...”
The reason this is all so brazen and so well documented is that these people literally did not see what they did as serious. They saw it as ‘civil disobedience’ at worst.

Why? Because they are White supremacists living in a white supremacist country.


In many parts of the country right now, law enforcement wouldn’t haven’t even pressed charges against them for any of this.

In fact, law enforcement were clearly among their ranks!

These 80%+ red counties are literal bastions of white supremacy.

But even as you move closer to the suburbs or even the cities, you still can get away with A LOT of this.

Lily white states from Maine to Iowa are places where white people feel entitled to do what they please, because this is THEIR country.

It’s a whole lot more convenient for a lot of people to act like these are Klansman from the Deep South, but the reality is, they are from every part of the country. If I had to guess, there are a lot more from up north than down south.

Because this is America.

Even today, while we are in the middle of a violent coup, the white legacy media barely ever mentions the term “white supremacy,” except when describing groups like the proud boys.

Because this is “divisive.”