BREAKING NEWS / DEVELOPING
Significant 3-Year Delta, Tomorrow!
18 posts to consider.
CHECKMATE inbound.
THREAD.
BIG news week?
Future proves past
..
NOTHING is a coincidence.
..
PATIENCE
THERE IS NO ESCAPE.
THERE ARE NO DEALS.
TREASON AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS
FOREIGN AGENTS WI|THIN OUR GOVERNMENT.
THE PUPPET MASTERS HAVE BEEN REMOVED.
...
Do you TRUST the US Military?
Do you TRUST the Chain of Command?
Have FAITH - WE ARE IN CONTROL.
..
YOU WERE CHOSEN FOR A REASON.
Jeremiah 29:11 [ESV]
11) For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare[a] and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.
https://t.co/tYDodo846P
[Moar FUTURE PROVES PAST]
Have you not discovered the CONFIRMED correlation between posts here and Tweets yet?
https://t.co/MT7mC2JjZR
Who benefits from silencing the voice or Julian Assange?
— :111% :I-AM:SOVEREIGN-INNATE :BENJA{R}M1N-A:BOCK-~ (@BenjaminABock) January 10, 2021
Jan 12: @JulianAssange
Jan 13: "Checkmate" 3 year Delta
Jan 14: ?https://t.co/VkvetT3hTA pic.twitter.com/42u4XSMBvQ
Upcoming three year delta for Wednesday, Jan. 13th, 2021.
— :111% :I-AM:SOVEREIGN-INNATE :BENJA{R}M1N-A:BOCK-~ (@BenjaminABock) January 12, 2021
Checkmate used two other times.
Suggested: read all three year deltas from Jan. 2018 pic.twitter.com/yobyU2De4y
"countermoves" … Q proof confirmed. Will "death blossom" be employed? DECLAS!
https://t.co/YDaa2NujzQ
More from For later read
How do I know they have NDAs, if they can't talk legally about them? Because they trusted me with their secrets... after I said something. That's how they knew I was safe.
And if the environment at the org was toxic or abusive, it is not uncommon to not realize the extent of that toxicity/abuse until after you're out. But by the time you realize that you signed under duress and presumed good faith where none existed, you're out of options.
— Lauren Thoman (@LaurenThoman) February 16, 2021
Some of the people who have reached out to me privately have been sitting with the pain of what happened to them and the regret that they signed for YEARS. But at the time, it didn't seem like they had any other option BUT to sign.
I do not blame *anyone* for signing an NDA, especially when it's attached to a financial lifeline. When you feel like your family's wellbeing is at stake, you'll do anything -- even sign away your own voice -- to provide for them. That's not a "choice"; that's survival.
And yes, many of the people whose stories I now know were pressured into signing an NDA by my husband's ex-employer. Some of whom I *never* would have guessed. People I thought "left well." Turns out, they've just been *very* good at abiding by the terms of their NDA.
(And others who have reached out had similar experiences with other Christian orgs. Turns out abuse, and the use of NDAs to cover up that abuse, is rampant in a LOT of places.)
You May Also Like
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Those who exited at 1500 needed money. They can always come back near 969. Those who exited at 230 also needed money. They can come back near 95.
Those who sold L @ 660 can always come back at 360. Those who sold S last week can be back @ 301
Sir, Log yahan.. 13 days patience nhi rakh sakte aur aap 2013 ki baat kar rahe ho. Even Aap Ready made portfolio banakar bhi de do to bhi wo 1 month me hi EXIT kar denge \U0001f602
— BhavinKhengarSuratGujarat (@IntradayWithBRK) September 19, 2021
Neuland 2700 se 1500 & Sequent 330 to 230 kya huwa.. 99% retailers/investors twitter par charcha n EXIT\U0001f602