https://t.co/MYSOjtjAe7
Jul15: Amaravati as Fin Hub https://t.co/iKoHYTw9xg
#Backstab or #DoubleTongue ! #Hubsmyth
\u0c05\u0c2e\u0c30\u0c3e\u0c35\u0c24\u0c3f \u0c1a\u0c41\u0c1f\u0c4d\u0c1f\u0c42 \u0c09\u0c2a\u0c3e\u0c27\u0c3f \u0c05\u0c35\u0c15\u0c3e\u0c36\u0c3e\u0c32\u0c41 \u0c2a\u0c46\u0c02\u0c1a\u0c47 9 \u0c28\u0c17\u0c30\u0c3e\u0c32\u0c41 https://t.co/Lp0aVmepIj
— Naveen Rjy (@naveenrjy) August 17, 2016
Flat Earth conference attendees explain how they have been brainwashed by YouTube and Infowarshttps://t.co/gqZwGXPOoc
— Raw Story (@RawStory) November 18, 2018
I'm increasingly interested in the idea of "personal moats" in the context of careers.
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
Moats should be:
- Hard to learn and hard to do (but perhaps easier for you)
- Skills that are rare and valuable
- Legible
- Compounding over time
- Unique to your own talents & interests https://t.co/bB3k1YcH5b
People talk about \u201cpassive income\u201d a lot but not about \u201cpassive social capital\u201d or \u201cpassive networking\u201d or \u201cpassive knowledge gaining\u201d but that\u2019s what you can architect if you have a thing and it grows over time without intensive constant effort to sustain it
— Andrew Chen (@andrewchen) November 22, 2018
Things that look like moats but likely aren\u2019t or may fade:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
- Proprietary networks
- Being something other than one of the best at any tournament style-game
- Many "awards"
- Twitter followers or general reach without "respect"
- Anything that depends on information asymmetry https://t.co/abjxesVIh9