Another text reflecting the auspicious and greatness of rainwater pouring when the transit of Sun is in Swati Nakshatra. Since this text is purely astrological, it doesn't mention Chatak bird (and importance of Moon's transit in Swati for it).
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E6QCDQIUcAA9xZ2.jpg)
More from Priyanka (Astrology Guidance)
Timings for Swati Nakshatra for tomorrow: 1:34AM IST on 18 July to 12:08 AM IST on July 19.
Information and instructions in two images enclosed herewith. Rainwater falling in this duration will count.
If you are abroad, check timings from Drik Panchang app/site for your city.
Keep in temple at home. Don't touch the container too often.
Information and instructions in two images enclosed herewith. Rainwater falling in this duration will count.
If you are abroad, check timings from Drik Panchang app/site for your city.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E6gGMciVIAIM3vu.png)
Keep in temple at home. Don't touch the container too often.
I don't have a place in my house where I store my money, I don't have much,but what ever I have, I keep it in the bank or P/O, use my ATM card to pay. What shall I do to multiply it? https://t.co/icM177OG8v
— JorEl (@RazdanSK) July 17, 2021
Weak Moon in chart causes emotional fluctuations, frustration, mood swings, disappointments, lack of attention, unwarranted aggression & procrastination.
Shravan month is best period to perform remedies of weak/Ksheena Moon. Worship Mahadev. It acts as Rambaan.
ॐ Namah Shivaya.
There is a Shiva Stuti in Rudrayamal. It is also called Shadakshara Stotra. You should chant it and perform the chant of Om Namah Shivaya 108 times thereafter on daily basis. It is highly effective in
Ma'am, donating any out of Ghee, Sugar, rice, milk, sugarcane, white cloth etc. to needy people in any quantity is considered very good remedy for Moon. Monday is preferred but it can done on other days too if someone is in need. Edibles in new
Shravan month is best period to perform remedies of weak/Ksheena Moon. Worship Mahadev. It acts as Rambaan.
ॐ Namah Shivaya.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E7xQwdjVIAMNT2D.jpg)
There is a Shiva Stuti in Rudrayamal. It is also called Shadakshara Stotra. You should chant it and perform the chant of Om Namah Shivaya 108 times thereafter on daily basis. It is highly effective in
I goes through with this right now.
— Vanvaashi (@vanvaashi) August 2, 2021
Worshiping Mahadev regularly,
Can you suggest some particular ritual/chant?
Ma'am, donating any out of Ghee, Sugar, rice, milk, sugarcane, white cloth etc. to needy people in any quantity is considered very good remedy for Moon. Monday is preferred but it can done on other days too if someone is in need. Edibles in new
Is jal-daan in matkas considered effective remedy for malefic/weakmoon in chart,.@AstroAmigo
— Juhi Rani Kaul (@kaul_juhi) August 2, 2021
More from Astro
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x