Anexcommie Authors NEO (New Account)

7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
NEO (New Account)
NEO (New Account)
@InfinityTarun
Teesta Files - Part 1 (Thread)
The lady who took supari to finish Modi

On Juhu road, most posh area of Mumbai, near to Amitabh Bachhan Bungalow there is a bungalow called "Nirant" that is 3 times bigger than Amitabh's Bungalow, cost of that bungalow is Rs 500 crore.

1/22


That Bungalow belongs to Social Activist Teesta Setalvad (TS).
How did a simple activist earned so much money ?
Why Sonia Gandhi gave her Padam Shri in 2007 ?

This is the spin chilling thread of harassments, fake narration building, misuse of courts, govt, system n NGO

TS's is a Guajarati, her great grandfather was loyal to Britishers, her grandfather was loyal to Nehru n was first Attorney General of India. All the anti Hindu laws of 50s were passed by Nehru on his consultation. Her father was also Sr. advocate.

She started her career as Journalist n covered riots of 1993. She married to Javed Anand. She was communist ideologist from childhood n started getting fund from Ford foundation for her NGO in 90s

TS and her husband, along with Father Cedric Prakash (a catholic priest), Anil Dharker (a journalist), Alyque Padamsee, Javed Akhtar, Vijay Tendulkar and Rahul Bose set up an NGO named "Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP)" on 1 April 2002
ALL
NEO (New Account)
NEO (New Account)
@InfinityTarun
Teesta Files (Part 2)

Plan was to get favorable report from SIT n to prosecutor Modi and send him to Jail but one honest man destroyed their plan.

In the first progress report in Nov 2010, SIT said that they didn't find any evidence that Modi was behind Gujarat riots.

23/40


Those who haven't read first part of the thread, Pl read first part here
https://t.co/NzfiEQXvNQ

Report was not as expected. SC asked amicus curie to visit Gujarat n check the authenticity of report.


Amicus curie Ramchandran n Bhooshan visited Gujarat to damage control and they gave their report that Modi sud be prosecuted.
On 15 March 2011, Supreme Court directed SIT to examine the observations of the amicus curiae, to re-examine the entire evidence recorded

and if some more evidence is required to be recorded, to do so. It observed that the SIT chairman's inferences did not match with the findings of the SIT probe.
This fight between SIT n Amicus curie kept going till 2012.

SIT kept saying that they didn't get any evidence against Modi and amicus curie kept saying that there r evidence against Modi n Modi sud be prosecuted.
Meanwhile they tried their best to attack on SIT Chief Raghwan also.
ALL