Jacobtldr Categories Politics
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
I’m just going to lay this down now so it’s on record:
Trump’s campaign has used the exact same strategy it used in 2016: smear his opponent; attempt to demotivate their base; and actively attempt to prevent or obstruct them from voting.
It is a push-down strategy.
1/
In 2016, didn’t win because he made a winning case to a big enough population.
He won because his opponent’s turnout was pushed down by a full-court press that tapped everything from misogyny to poll tampering.
2/
He is trying to run the exact same playbook against Biden.
But it isn’t working because:
1) We now understand it
2) Many who were effectively suppressed last time have had four years to see what that cost
3) Biden isn’t susceptible to the same illegitimate biases
3/
And 4) Many people who first engaged with politics because of Bernie are now well past the “...or Bust” vibe of 2016 and are now solidly active progressive voters
The media, pundits and analysts never fully reckoned with the extent to which Hillary’s vote was just suppressed.
4/
Instead, they overestimated Trump’s strength.
Trump only won by smothering just enough of his opponent’s support.
Some of the voters who that succeeded with in 2016 are vehemently un-smotherable this time.
5/
Trump’s campaign has used the exact same strategy it used in 2016: smear his opponent; attempt to demotivate their base; and actively attempt to prevent or obstruct them from voting.
It is a push-down strategy.
1/
Striking finding from NYT/Siena: Biden has big leads among those who didn't vote in 2016. And they make up non-trivial portions of the electorate.
— Greg Sargent (@ThePlumLineGS) November 1, 2020
Here are Biden's leads, followed by their vote share:
WI +19 (11%)
FL +17 (18%)
PA +12 (18%)
AZ +7 (22%)
It's a new electorate.
In 2016, didn’t win because he made a winning case to a big enough population.
He won because his opponent’s turnout was pushed down by a full-court press that tapped everything from misogyny to poll tampering.
2/
He is trying to run the exact same playbook against Biden.
But it isn’t working because:
1) We now understand it
2) Many who were effectively suppressed last time have had four years to see what that cost
3) Biden isn’t susceptible to the same illegitimate biases
3/
And 4) Many people who first engaged with politics because of Bernie are now well past the “...or Bust” vibe of 2016 and are now solidly active progressive voters
The media, pundits and analysts never fully reckoned with the extent to which Hillary’s vote was just suppressed.
4/
Instead, they overestimated Trump’s strength.
Trump only won by smothering just enough of his opponent’s support.
Some of the voters who that succeeded with in 2016 are vehemently un-smotherable this time.
5/
People are already attacking Siegel as a 'Fox News guy'.
See...this is why I don't believe the Left really believes in science either...just their narrative.
Siegel does work for Fox, but is a Professor at NYU, FACP, etc.
But liberals are going to dismiss him...why?
If your first response is to dismiss someone because of their political or media affiliation...maybe consider that it is YOU that is the biased one.
Just saying.
Siegel may do a good job, or bad job (like Sanjay Gupta, who has done a good job in the past, but been awful of late). But he is a good physician. Just dismissing him without evidence is exactly the kind of thing Trump would do.
If we were consistent, we'd demand Biden perform tests on air too.
Of course, Dems don't want to do that. So there is a ton of hypocrisy here.
See...this is why I don't believe the Left really believes in science either...just their narrative.
Siegel does work for Fox, but is a Professor at NYU, FACP, etc.
But liberals are going to dismiss him...why?
Fox News Dr. Marc Siegel Will Interview Trump, Conduct 'Medical Evaluation' On-Camera Friday Night https://t.co/iqOWU7ra4b
— Mediaite (@Mediaite) October 9, 2020
If your first response is to dismiss someone because of their political or media affiliation...maybe consider that it is YOU that is the biased one.
Just saying.
Siegel may do a good job, or bad job (like Sanjay Gupta, who has done a good job in the past, but been awful of late). But he is a good physician. Just dismissing him without evidence is exactly the kind of thing Trump would do.
If we were consistent, we'd demand Biden perform tests on air too.
Of course, Dems don't want to do that. So there is a ton of hypocrisy here.
The question becomes, how would the Federal government ensure that the ballots are watermarked, if the states control
I looked into printing, it\u2019s done all over the country at many different printers, counties handle own printing. The security paper is the only possibility I can think of but I\u2019m no expert.
— \u2764\ufe0f\U0001f90d\U0001f499Ali11111\u2764\ufe0f\U0001f90d\U0001f499 (@AL233111) November 10, 2020
It makes sense to me.
Donald Trump is the most energizing and polarizing force in American politics in living memory.
He turned out insane numbers both of lovers and haters. It’s not hard to see the haters outnumber the lovers.
The ‘you’re telling me more people voted for Nobody Biden than Messiah Obama?!’ incredulity ignores the reality of Trump.
No. No one voted for Biden. They voted against ‘Literal Hitler’.
Of course they did. The media programmed them to. The academy. The swamp...
Trump’s strength and weakness are his inability to avoid the spotlight. He wouldn’t let the election be a referendum on Biden and the left. If he had, he might have blunted the turnout on the left.
...
Instead, he made it about himself - and he is the most hated (and lived) guy in America.
The people turned out to ‘topple a dictator.’ They voted ‘like their lives depended on it.’ They stopped ‘fascism!’
Throw in the fact they didn’t actually have to ‘turnout’ at all, they just had to fill in ballots that were mailed directly to them, and it’s no surprise at all so many voted.
The left fundamentally altered the process of voting to create the surge. It worked. We’re surprised?
Donald Trump is the most energizing and polarizing force in American politics in living memory.
He turned out insane numbers both of lovers and haters. It’s not hard to see the haters outnumber the lovers.
It\u2019ll never make sense to me. https://t.co/p58o1Xw47a
— Cerno (@Cernovich) November 25, 2020
The ‘you’re telling me more people voted for Nobody Biden than Messiah Obama?!’ incredulity ignores the reality of Trump.
No. No one voted for Biden. They voted against ‘Literal Hitler’.
Of course they did. The media programmed them to. The academy. The swamp...
Trump’s strength and weakness are his inability to avoid the spotlight. He wouldn’t let the election be a referendum on Biden and the left. If he had, he might have blunted the turnout on the left.
...
Instead, he made it about himself - and he is the most hated (and lived) guy in America.
The people turned out to ‘topple a dictator.’ They voted ‘like their lives depended on it.’ They stopped ‘fascism!’
Throw in the fact they didn’t actually have to ‘turnout’ at all, they just had to fill in ballots that were mailed directly to them, and it’s no surprise at all so many voted.
The left fundamentally altered the process of voting to create the surge. It worked. We’re surprised?
The Trump administration will be over on January 20, but officials like Attorney General William Barr — who has been involved in some of this administration’s most corrupt policies — must not be allowed to escape accountability.
Here’s what we’re still investigating:1/
President Trump has sought to transform DOJ into a political weapon meant to serve his allies & punish his perceived enemies.
We've uncovered details on the extent to which Barr has aided those efforts, including the Durham investigation, Roger Stone’s sentencing & more. 2/
Our FOIA litigation revealed that Barr met frequently with federal prosecutor John Durham, who was tasked with looking into the origins of the Russia investigation — 18 times in the 7 months after the Mueller investigation ended.
On March 25, 2019 — just a day after Barr submitted his letter summarizing the Mueller report to Congress — Durham met with Barr, Barr’s then-Chief of Staff Brian Rabbitt and two career officials from the department’s Justice Management Division. 4/
https://t.co/iQAR0VHSJx
Despite Barr’s frequent public statements about the ongoing Durham investigation, DOJ has selectively chosen to invoke the “ongoing investigation” privilege to withhold documents the public needs in order to understand Durham’s work.
Here’s what we’re still investigating:1/
President Trump has sought to transform DOJ into a political weapon meant to serve his allies & punish his perceived enemies.
We've uncovered details on the extent to which Barr has aided those efforts, including the Durham investigation, Roger Stone’s sentencing & more. 2/
Our FOIA litigation revealed that Barr met frequently with federal prosecutor John Durham, who was tasked with looking into the origins of the Russia investigation — 18 times in the 7 months after the Mueller investigation ended.
On March 25, 2019 — just a day after Barr submitted his letter summarizing the Mueller report to Congress — Durham met with Barr, Barr’s then-Chief of Staff Brian Rabbitt and two career officials from the department’s Justice Management Division. 4/
https://t.co/iQAR0VHSJx
Despite Barr’s frequent public statements about the ongoing Durham investigation, DOJ has selectively chosen to invoke the “ongoing investigation” privilege to withhold documents the public needs in order to understand Durham’s work.