Jacobtldr's Categories

Jacobtldr's Authors

Latest Saves

OK here is my take on the 'grievance studies hoax.' I think it shows that generally poorly reasoned, largely unfalsifiable papers with apparently absurd conclusions can get published in top journals in critical-studies-type fields. Fair enough. But it does NOT show a special ...


... kind of 'deep corruption' in such fields as compared to many other fields the hoax authors presumably regard as more 'reason and evidence based' or 'less ideological/political' (e.g., medicine? experimental psychology?). A whole thrust of the "replication crisis" in ...

... psychology, for example, has been that (a) seemingly absurd claims based on (b) insufficiently robust evidence to support such claims can get regularly published in (c) top journals (including Science! and Nature!), insofar as authors 'play the game' of the dominant ...

perspectives/ideologies/dogmas in those fields (see, e.g., "The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science" https://t.co/6IpRC3RGYt). To illustrate, the statistical ritual of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (https://t.co/sFK5omcEtk) has effectively been a publication ...

criterion in, not only psychology, but MANY 'more serious' scientific fields for decades, despite the fact that the way it's characteristically been (mindlessly) used has been as a kind of statistical magic that produces loads of nonsense 'findings' that are just noise ...
Yes, we have been more divided than we are now. Within living memory.


Labor disputes used to kill hundreds of people!

In 1932 Douglas MacArthur called in tanks on protesting veterans, injuring over a thousand people!

In 1967 there were 159 race riots in cities across

In 1921, rioters used airplanes to bomb black businesses in Tulsa, Oklahoma! Hundreds were killed in the riot!
Been thinking about the person who called the cops on the dog truck yesterday, and the details that lead folks to make judgments, most of which have nothing to do with the actual health/safety/happiness of the dogs.


If you google “sled dog truck,” you’ll see that a lot of mushers put dog silhouettes on the doors, or paw prints, or bright colors. There’s even this painted truck in Colorado, which is a-maz-ing.


We bought our dog boxes used (after our last truck burned down, we moved them onto a new flatbed) and our priority has always been making sure they’re safe, dry, well-ventilated, and comfortable. The dogs jump right into their boxes; they love going for car rides.


We like the steel doors because they’re rustproof and let the dogs see/smell everything that’s going by. In our climate, we’re usually more concerned with keeping the dogs cool—and making sure they have fresh air and ventilation—than keeping them warm.


But how many people see these doors, with their vertical bars, and immediately think of dogs in jail?
This is dangerous.

Lately, Trump has essentially claimed that Democrats and the press are not just political opponents, but violent enemies of the state.

The President is radicalizing his supporters and it gets covered as if it’s just campaign tactics.

Wake up.


Meanwhile, we have orgs like @axios acting as if “both sides” are equally to blame for this

It’s President Trump and the @GOP dividing us

Trump, the @GOP, and conservative media push gaslighting, false narratives and perpetuate the culture war, not


When @realDonaldTrump and the @GOP’s anti-Democratic behavior is covered as if it’s just politics as usual, and journalists search for ways to pin this devolution of our national discourse on “both sides,” it only perpetuates the divide by normalizing what the right is doing.

There is only one way to look at this:

Trump and the @GOP have anti-democratic impulses, assault the rule of law, and engineered minority rule through gerrymandering/voter suppression

Meanwhile, Democrats are actually fighting for the majority and want to uphold the rule of law

Why am I criticizing the media in a thread about Trump? I believe media is the lens through which people perceive reality (why I co-founded @RanttMedia).

When that lens isn’t held responsibly (falsely equalizes a dangerous demagogue with his opposition) it misleads the public.