7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
Do Kwon has stated numerous times that TFL has zero new LUNA tokens, making Terra 2 'community owned'. This is an outright lie that nobody seems to be talking about. In fact, TFL owns 42M LUNA, worth over $200m, and they're lying through their teeth. (1/6)


TFL Dawn (11.28M):
https://t.co/67XVH8t50D
TFL shadow wallet (2.01M): https://t.co/k5k3g02LP2
TFL MM (0.72M): https://t.co/16CqyPcUL4
Do Kwon shadow wallet #1 (19.69M): https://t.co/kfFx1ck8gR
Do Kwon shadow wallet #2 (9.11M): https://t.co/pevv1xT0yR
Total: 42.81M LUNA (2/6)

Do used his shadow wallet to approve *his own proposal* through governance manipulation (TFL is not supposed to vote), told everyone it would be a community-owned chain, and then gave himself a nine-figure score. These are just the verified wallets - there are many others. (3/6)

In the investing landscape, it's important that retail receives symmetric information, so understand the facts and make of this what you will. Exercise caution and know what you are buying. These people have no moral fibre. They will lie for money at every possible turn. (4/6)

There are many hidden truths to uncover, such as how Do Kwon conspired with Delphi to insider trade their own tokens & hand out preferential allocations for personal profit, how some major Terra protocols are shadow coded by Do himself, what went on in the 'Elders group'... (5/6)
๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡ Here's a deep dive into chain data suggesting Mirror Protocol, TFL's 'decentralized' stock exchange, is really just a farce designed to enrich Do Kwon/VCs while manipulating governance and screwing over retail. Thank you for being so bad at hiding on-chain moves, Do. ๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡

Take a look at the wallet on Ethereum that deployed the Mirror yield farming contracts. Mirror was created by TFL. You can unpack a decent amount of the story by tracing transfers from this wallet... (1/19)

537 days ago, the address now known as 'Wormhole: Deployer 4' was funded with initial gas from the Ethereum wallet that initiated Mirror's contract deployals. I've linked both the wallet address and the gas transfer. (2/19)
https://t.co/AxTm94HUti

At several points in time, this Wormhole-related address (remember who owns Wormhole? Hi again @KanavKariya) owned most of the Mirror LPs on Ethereum. They thus farmed most of the MIR rewards, which would allow them to have a disproportionate say in governance decisions. (3/19)

But they don't want anyone to know this. I have found evidence that this wallet and related wallets try very hard to make it look like MIR governance is not majority-controlled by a single entity - they do so by splitting up MIR between several fresh anonymous wallets. (4/19)
๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡ What if I told you that Mirror Protocol, up until 18 days ago, was susceptible to the one of the most profitable exploits of all time, allowing an attacker to generate $4.3m from $10k in a single transaction? Here's how I discovered this - by pure serendipity. ๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡

Let's go back to May 9th, when a Mirror contract migration to fix short rewards locked people's funds by accident. We've discussed this before - that's not the point. But take a look at this thread.
https://t.co/Qaw91D42dz (1/12)

It appears that OP is indeed correct - Mirror developers smuggled in a major bug fix without announcing it or telling anyone that this bug ever existed, which is slightly infuriating, but what can you do. So how exactly did this bug work? (2/12)

The Mirror Lock contract (that locks your collateral for 14 days when you short) lets you call an unlock function to unlock collateral via a list of position IDs. But they left out something crucial... A duplicate check. This fix was quietly smuggled in 18 days ago. (3/12)


The problem with having no duplicate check is an attacker can create a short position, and after 14 days, they could call their position ID multiple times in a list. This would let them steal funds from the lock contract over and over at little cost and zero risk. (4/12)