Gonna talk "pitching story" for a moment, because that's how I get most of my screenwriting work and it's hard to find practical information about the art of it online and in books. This is just my experience and approach, but in the age of zoom, some of this may be helpful...

My primary goal when I pitch is TO ENGAGE THE AUDIENCE EMOTIONALLY. Yes, I'm telling the story, but for me storytelling is a vehicle that delivers emotion to an audience. I structure my pitch around emotion.

I learned this from my TV boss, Greg Walker.

How do I do it?
Two things I make sure I have in my pitch.

1. An early moment, usually in the first 30-60 seconds of speaking that creates a VIVID, EMOTIONALLY PROVOCATIVE IMAGE in the mind of the listener. We're pitching movies and TV. Those are VISUAL MEDIUMS. I drop that image early.
Sometimes, even though I can't draw, I'll sketch it out just to make *sure* it works. It'll usually revolve around a plot point, but the main goal is to get the audience to stop listening and start SEEING what I'm saying.

Then it's like storytelling at a campfire.
Having that image EARLY in your pitch can let the audience know that THIS IS INDEED A MOVIE. Once they can see the movie, then they're a little more with you. It still may not be the movie they want, but it's a movie. That's a win. The second thing I do is --
Articulate an early moment in the story that invests the audience into the protagonist. The late Blake Snyder would save "save the cat," meaning the protagonist does something kind to help you identify. I don't think it has to be that...
...it can be something cruel (if they're an anti-hero) but just make sure it's INTERESTING and it sets up their character for their arc.

Generally, people remember your open. They remember your ending. They lose a lot of your middle. Because of that I always make sure --
I'm setting up the protagonist's arc in a powerful way so when I complete that arc in a *hopefully* equally powerful way, they remember the set up and appreciate that payoff.

They remember the open. They remember the ending. If you're lucky, they remember the middle.
Keeping with the theme of emotion, I make sure to track how a character is FEELING throughout the narrative details of plot.

"...And now they're devastated because their one chance is gone..."

"...but that little victory gives them the hope they need to keep going..."
I call it *emotional annotation* but it's just me making sure the audience can track how the characters are feeling because if they can do that, even if they're confused about a plot point (which you'll get a note about later) they're with you on your overall story.
Pitching is not a defensive art. Pitching is an offensive art with the goal of taking your audience from the real world into the world of your imagination. It's making a little magic happen in the room (digital or otherwise).

Emotion is the ally of the magician. Engage it.
Homework:

Go through your pitches and make sure you have FIVE POWERFUL, EMOTIONAL moments (ideally tied to cinematic imagery). One in the open. Two in the middle. Two in the end. Roughly. YMMV, but tracking that and actively communicating it will help your career.

/END
*when I said you'll get a note later about the audience being confused by plot I meant that if you're hired usually the executives will target those bumps in their notes.

So your story will have to make sense, hahahaha. You can't just use the "feels" and be incoherent.

More from Writing

The world's most valuable skill:

Writing effectively.

But colleges charge you 120k and still do a terrible job teaching it.

Instead, here are 9 writing frameworks that cost you nothing and will save you hundreds of hours:

1. Start with building your writing habit by leveraging @jamesclear's Four Laws of Behavior


2. With your writing habit down, study these 10 tips from the world's most legendary marketer: David Ogilvy.


3. Then, immerse yourself in the takeaways from the bible on business


4. Like to learn on the go?

Dive into the creative process of the world's best writers in these 10 episodes of the @timferriss show.
Things we don’t learn in this article: that the author wrote David Cameron’s speeches during the period when they were intentionally underfunding the NHS and other services, directly creating the problem the author is concerned about now.


We also don’t learn that the paper it’s written in stridently supported those measures and attacked junior doctors threatening strike action over NHS cuts and long working hours, accusing them of holding the country to ransom.

We aren’t reminded that NHS funding and the future of health provision was a central part of previous election campaigns, and that attempts to highlight these problems were swiftly stomped on or diverted and then ignored by most of the press, including the Times.

I’d underline here that “corruption” doesn’t just mean money in brown envelopes: it describes a situation where much of an organisation is personally motivated to ignore, downplay or divert from malfeasance for personal reasons - because highlighting them would be bad for careers

Foges was Cameron’s speechwriter at the height of austerity; Forsyth is married to the PM’s spokesman; Danny F is a Tory peer; Parris is a former MP; Gove used to write for them regularly, and that’s before we get to professional mates-with-ministers like Shipman or Montgomerie.

You May Also Like

So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.


The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.

This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.

The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."

This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.