Dreams in the first quarter(पहर) of the day give result in one year, if the dreams are in the second quarter(प्रहर) the results are in eight months, for third the dreams are fulfilled in three months,
MEANING, EXPLANATION & INTERPRETATION OF YOUR DREAMS, ALSO ITS EFFECTS IN COMING DAYS
Sigmund Freud had explained the interpretation of dreams in the last century, but our scriptures explained this thousands of years back. What is the significance and meaning of our dreams.

Dreams in the first quarter(पहर) of the day give result in one year, if the dreams are in the second quarter(प्रहर) the results are in eight months, for third the dreams are fulfilled in three months,
If you dream during your tense and worrisome period those are never realized. People with Negative traits never get their dreams fulfilled.
You will gain wealth if you see the following things in your dream- cow,elephant, horse, palace, climbing mountains or trees,
You will attain more land if you see someone
singing with veena in his hands.
You will attain amrit if you see yourself entering a red sea or entering into narak.
If you see yourself in iron chains you will attain fame or a son.
You are about to become a King or a leader if you dream and see a broken leaf with curd.
If you are in pain or see a monkey, fish, pearl, conch, diamond, blood, chandan, creepers and mango in a dream, you will be rich.
If you see a statue or a shivling then you will be victorious in your endeavor.
If you see Sun and Moon you will remain healthy.
If you see a smiling Brahmin lady coming to your house you will be getting something that you immensely like.
If someone gives you a flower in your hand you will get the Punya of tirth Snan.
If you see yourself donating something to a Brahmin you will be wealthy.
You will be a great scholar if you dream of a eight year old child or see anybody giving you a book or a mother/ father teaching you,
You will attain a mantra siddhi if someone whispers mantra in your ear in your dream.
Someone giving you a white grain in dreams makes you a King.
Seeing a dream of well, pond, lake white mountain and white snakes makes you rich.
The Brahmin that you see in dreams is actually a swaroop of Shiv and Vishnu. Brahmini is Laxmi or Parvati swaroop. Radha comes as gwalin and children are Bal gopal.
Instagram link👇
https://t.co/l3vxrVadGj
Facebook page link👇
https://t.co/zXjYSQKZrK
Source - Brahma Vaivartva puran
https://t.co/W2jnWlziJC
https://t.co/HTVb4OrefP
#\u0936\u093e\u0938\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u094b\u0902_\u092e\u0948\u0902_\u0938\u092a\u0928\u094b\u0902_\u0915\u093e_\u092e\u0939\u0924\u094d\u0935
— \u092a\u0902\u0921\u093f\u0924 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u093e\u0932 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u094b\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f (@VishalS50533075) February 16, 2021
\u0938\u093f\u0917\u092e\u0902\u0921 \u092b\u094d\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0921 \u0928\u0947 \u092a\u093f\u091b\u0932\u0940 \u0938\u0926\u0940 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0938\u092a\u0928\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u0940 \u0935\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0916\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0915\u0940 \u0925\u0940, \u0932\u0947\u0915\u093f\u0928 \u0939\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0947 \u0936\u093e\u0938\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u094b\u0902 \u0928\u0947 \u0939\u091c\u093e\u0930\u094b\u0902 \u0938\u093e\u0932 \u092a\u0939\u0932\u0947 \u0907\u0938\u0947 \u0938\u092e\u091d\u093e\u092f\u093e \u0925\u093e\u0964 \u0939\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0947 \u0938\u092a\u0928\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u093e \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094d\u0935 \u0914\u0930 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u0925 \u0915\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0939\u0948\u0964 pic.twitter.com/aWBTCAmrpI
More from Anshul Pandey
More from Life
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x