I've talked about how governments are doubling down as denial that they might have been scammed. Let's talk about how individual persons react.

The constant panic mindset of these people may be chalked up to virtue signalling, but it's also an indication of implicit denial of the idea that their measures have little to no effect
This is the sunk cost effect to being scammed, and so we see the wider acceptance of this virus being more deadly than the alternative of NPI's having minimal effect
Think of it this way, you spent a lot of money on masks, followed every rule to your detriment, and you have nothing to show for it e.g., your neighbor not following measures hasn't died yet
You can cut your losses and be more proportional with your behavior, but tons of factors make justifying measures in the form of exaggerating virus damages a better option
The first of this is stigma, if at any point you oppose the measures you will be called a murderer. The strength of this accusation is enough for many to tow the line
Second is fear that the misfortune of infection will happen by not following. Every time someone doesn't comply and gets infected is amplifies to send the message: retribution comes to he who dares oppose the virus
I can list many more, but an overlooked aspect is really the sunk cost fallacy. If you read carefully to lockdowner points they assume measures ought to have an effect even if it's not empirically shown to be so
That is, it's impossible for measures not to be effecacious simply on the flawed assumption that the alternative is way worse: If we didn't do this we'd see more deaths so the measures do something
Like a gambler unable to stop himself, lockdowners will continue to follow rules however irrational on the basis that they will be spared from the virus
And thus the sight of anyone opposing measures breaks their illusion of safety, they cannot let anything show that they have been scammed
In conclusion, people who have been convinced of the deadliness of the virus will continue in this mindset as justification of all the resources they put into what they perceive as safety
Sorry for the messy train of thought, it's hard to find the right words

More from Life

You May Also Like

Assalam Alaiki dear Sister in Islam. I hope this meets you well. Hope you are keeping safe in this pandemic. May Allah preserve you and your beloved family. I would like to address the misconception and misinterpretation in your thread. Please peruse the THREAD below.


1. First off, a disclaimer. Should you feel hurt by my words in the course of the thread, then forgive me. It’s from me and not from Islam. And I probably have to improve on my delivery. And I may not quote you verbatim, but the intended meaning would be there. Thank You!

2. Standing on Imam Shafii’s quote: “And I never debated anyone but that I did not mind whether Allah clarified the truth on my tongue or his tongue” or “I never once debated anyone hoping to win the debate; rather I always wished that the truth would come from his side.”

3. Okay, into the meat (my love for meat is showing. Lol) of the thread. Even though you didn’t mention the verse that permitted polygamy, everyone knows the verse you were talking about (Q4:3).


4. Your reasons for the revelation of the verse are strange. The first time I came across such. I had to quickly consult the books on the exegeses or tafsir of the Quran written by renowned specialists!