19 December 2020 #MAGAanalysis #OVERTURN
The Signals Are Accelerating And Strengthening
I consider the tweet below the most important yet. We'll immediately discuss why below. After that there are two documents and an interview to work on. Clarity is arising, pointing the way.
Peter Navarro releases 36-page report alleging election fraud 'more than sufficient' to swing victory to Trump https://t.co/D8KrMHnFdK. A great report by Peter. Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election. Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 19, 2020
https://t.co/AKot2A8juc
THE IMMACULATE DECEPTION:
Six Key Dimensions of Election Irregularities
Later this morning, we'll come back and study this report together. Right now what is the signal in that name? It of course summons the term "Immaculate Conception."
https://t.co/3W52ZJZE1Z
Peter Navarro releases 36-page report alleging election fraud 'more than sufficient' to swing victory to Trump
Now that, my friends, is a signal. Not only is Trump telling us he will NOT concede, he's claiming victory.
1) Peter Navarro releases 36-page report
2) Alleging election fraud 'more than sufficient'
3) To swing victory to Trump
4) Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election
5) Big protest in D.C. on January 6th
7) Be there, will be wild!
1) Peter Navarro releases 36-page report
2) Alleging election fraud 'more than sufficient'
3) To swing victory to Trump
Now THAT is guidance.
Letting go of landslide - which it was - victory is all that matters. Trump has 100% claimed victory.
That matters.
Voter Fraud Stole The 2020 Election
We won. Our victory was stolen.
This is new territory.
Take that in.
This was a stolen election.
You need to know.
4) Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election
Crunch it all up. Analyse this or that. The bottom line is that in this case, an election is a statistical thing. We have to talk about that.
1) Peter Navarro releases 36-page report
2) Alleging election fraud 'more than sufficient'
3) To swing victory to Trump
4) Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election
5) Big protest in D.C. on January 6th
7) Be there, will be wild!
1) Peter Navarro releases 36-page report
2) Alleging election fraud 'more than sufficient'
3) To swing victory to Trump
4) Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election
5) Big protest in D.C. on January 6th
6) Be there, will be wild!
PROTEST
We must protest this attempted theft. And on that note:
5) Big protest in D.C. on January 6th
President Trump has sent out a clear signal. The protest in D.C. on January 6 is his command to us. Be there, or be square. But his words are...
6) Be there, will be wild!
Is this the voice of man giving up? Does this signal surrender in any possible way? Not a chance. This election IS NOT OVER.
https://t.co/YqLuKa3uWD
More from Pasquale "Pat" Scopelliti
3 January 2020 #MAGAanalysis #Overturn
We MUST Bend Congress to OUR Will
We'll watch Madison's amazing video very carefully together below. Alone with a few general comments, we have three other sources to consider today as well. But watch Madison first, in full.
We MUST Bend Congress to OUR Will
We'll watch Madison's amazing video very carefully together below. Alone with a few general comments, we have three other sources to consider today as well. But watch Madison first, in full.
This is why I am OBJECTING to the 2020 election results.
— Madison Cawthorn (@CawthornforNC) December 31, 2020
The right to vote in a free and fair election is the cornerstone of our Republic. Attempts to undermine this strike at the very heart of a representative government \u201cof, by, and for the People.\u201d
I will not be silent. pic.twitter.com/MbQX9lTfQ6
More from Fraud
A thread on attempted election fraud in Canada: First, most breaches of election law here are related to financing, not illegal voting or ballot-box stuffing. And most are minor. That’s because our elxn finance laws are extremely tight and contribution/spending limits low. 1/
I covered two of the best-known cases in recent years: “robocalls” in 2011 election and the “in-and-out” affair of 2006. You probably heard a lot about the former and maybe nothing of the latter. Both were important for different reasons. 2/
In robocalls, the Conservative party’s voter-tracking database, CIMS, was used to make fraudulent automated calls to about 7,000 identified Liberal voters in Guelph, Ontario, directing them to the wrong polling location. The scheme didn’t work. The Liberals won the riding. 3/
Elections Canada caught on to the scheme on the day the calls were made, election day, and began investigating almost immediately. The long and complex investigation found the calls originated with someone working for the Conservative candidate in Guelph. 4/
After a trial, a lone campaign staffer was found guilty. He served jail time. The judge said it appeared to him others were likely involved but no one else was charged. Throughout, the CPC denied any knowledge of the scheme. 5/
Hey Canada, can we talk about how Conservatives are fundraising based on dangerous lies & how it needs to stop immediately? #cdnpoli pic.twitter.com/2LSHcJtsMf
— \U0001f142\U0001f130\U0001f13c\U0001f138 (@samifouad) January 8, 2021
I covered two of the best-known cases in recent years: “robocalls” in 2011 election and the “in-and-out” affair of 2006. You probably heard a lot about the former and maybe nothing of the latter. Both were important for different reasons. 2/
In robocalls, the Conservative party’s voter-tracking database, CIMS, was used to make fraudulent automated calls to about 7,000 identified Liberal voters in Guelph, Ontario, directing them to the wrong polling location. The scheme didn’t work. The Liberals won the riding. 3/
Elections Canada caught on to the scheme on the day the calls were made, election day, and began investigating almost immediately. The long and complex investigation found the calls originated with someone working for the Conservative candidate in Guelph. 4/
After a trial, a lone campaign staffer was found guilty. He served jail time. The judge said it appeared to him others were likely involved but no one else was charged. Throughout, the CPC denied any knowledge of the scheme. 5/