- Management has never been into any corporate governance issue so far & sounds so clean that it may never get into any corporate governance issue in future too.
Since the debate on 'What is quality' is never ending, here is a thread on few points that I feel useful in judging if the company is a quality company or not.
Have a look at the entire thread & please add more useful points from your end.
Please RT for wider participation.
- Management has never been into any corporate governance issue so far & sounds so clean that it may never get into any corporate governance issue in future too.
- Besides corporate governance & beyond the company, management has never been into any wrong doings in the public domain, viz. any fraud or criminal activity.
- Management doesn't come too often on media, into investor meets, meet 1-1 with investors.
Such management focus on business rather than investors.
- Management doesn't grow business too aggressively.
Conservative management with a milestone based approach helps better in long run.
- With the ageing of management, there is a visible succession plan.
The next generation entrepreneurs, either from family or outside, should be aligned well with the company objectives.
- An untimely acquisition, expansion to excess capacity, expanding into areas of less expertise, expanding into over crowded geographies.
If management doing any of these, needs to be understood deep.
Management should not be over confident.
- Growing the company at the cost of debt may not work always.
Management should be efficient in containing costs & managing debt.
Debt free companies with reasonable promoter stake & zero pledging are safe & sound.
- Management should be stakeholder friendly.
There should be respectable dividend payout out of the profits.
If any unforeseen accident in company, employees should be well taken care of and Business customers should be well informed.
More from LearnLifeWealthTravel | Dream Big, Think Growth !!
You May Also Like
The first area to focus on is diversity. This has become a dogma in the tech world, and despite the fact that tech is one of the most meritocratic industries in the world, there are constant efforts to promote diversity at the expense of fairness, merit and competency. Examples:
USC's Interactive Media & Games Division cancels all-star panel that included top-tier game developers who were invited to share their experiences with students. Why? Because there were no women on the
ElectronConf is a conf which chooses presenters based on blind auditions; the identity, gender, and race of the speaker is not known to the selection team. The results of that merit-based approach was an all-male panel. So they cancelled the conference.
Apple's head of diversity (a black woman) got in trouble for promoting a vision of diversity that is at odds with contemporary progressive dogma. (She left the company shortly after this
Also in the name of diversity, there is unabashed discrimination against men (especially white men) in tech, in both hiring policies and in other arenas. One such example is this, a developer workshop that specifically excluded men: https://t.co/N0SkH4hR35
USC's Interactive Media & Games Division cancels all-star panel that included top-tier game developers who were invited to share their experiences with students. Why? Because there were no women on the
ElectronConf is a conf which chooses presenters based on blind auditions; the identity, gender, and race of the speaker is not known to the selection team. The results of that merit-based approach was an all-male panel. So they cancelled the conference.
Apple's head of diversity (a black woman) got in trouble for promoting a vision of diversity that is at odds with contemporary progressive dogma. (She left the company shortly after this
Also in the name of diversity, there is unabashed discrimination against men (especially white men) in tech, in both hiring policies and in other arenas. One such example is this, a developer workshop that specifically excluded men: https://t.co/N0SkH4hR35
