#HAPPSTMNDS
Happiest Minds Technologies Ltd interesting chart setup, we have fresh Bullish ABC B/O after good consolidation. @flyingvikas129
2nd is Ratio chart
More from Happymind
The reason why I preferred #happiestminds to include in long term portfolio
Since then MCAP has moved from 7.5k Cr to 10.5k Cr which is more than 40% returns..
I feel it's a start for a long journey for this one.. do read the thread and study 👇
Since then MCAP has moved from 7.5k Cr to 10.5k Cr which is more than 40% returns..
I feel it's a start for a long journey for this one.. do read the thread and study 👇
Thread 4/6
— TheMillionaire \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@BornToBeSucceed) April 2, 2021
Financial Data since March 2019\U0001f447
Revenue jumped 590 Cr to 739 Cr
(CAGR of 13.7%)
Interesting facts: Profit jumped from 14 Cr to 132 Cr and that's Incredible ( CAGR of 260%) \U0001f680\U0001f680 pic.twitter.com/hj02EMzOHq
#HappiestMinds Bhai thoda correct hoja, mujhe buy karna hai!! haha. https://t.co/sDJrKPyNzT
#RecentIPOs I am posting charts of IPOs listed since 2019 showing decent patterns. This is my understanding and no recommendation#HappiestMinds Just broken out again pic.twitter.com/wMaqKYVAeP
— Dare2Dream (@Dare2Dr10109801) April 3, 2021
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".