THREAD (WOW!)

1) If you want to watch a Coordinated Media Disinformation Campaign play out (just like the Trump-Russia Collision Hoax), there's one playing out right now in real

2) @TWPundit Exclusively Reported 10/13

"expect to see multiple...stories related to Turkey which will...be tied together by a massive “bombshell” piece in the @nytimes ...near election day in a well-coordinated smear campaign"
Yep, the piece just dropped
https://t.co/ncqK9IrwEv
3) The Turkey Disinformation Campaign is following the exact same playbook as the 2016 Trump-Russia Collision Hoax, and with all the same players
https://t.co/W4qEDSHFAZ
4) In 2016, there were 3 separate stories related to Russia’s connection to @realDonaldTrump that dropped on Oct 31st.

Article #1 from Soros-funded @MotherJones by @DavidCornDC about @carterwpage alleging he was a secret Russian operative. Fake news!

https://t.co/7T9G1p4lzW
5) Article #2 from @FinancialTimes about @SergeiMillian and his connection to Trump Tower projects

https://t.co/OipMuPB8gh
6) Article #3 from @Slate by @franklinfoer about Alfa Bank and how the Trump Campaign was secretly communicating with the Russians through a secret server in Trump Tower ( more fake news)
https://t.co/BgdQEnp1Og
7) @nytimes coordinating w/ the others, + FBI, & FusionGPS, was supposed to tie it all together. Instead published this article stating investigation was dropped because the FBI found no links to Russia.

FBI panicked at the last moment & attempted to bail https://t.co/6tOtP3wPfU
8) I'll get in more debunking the of the
@nytimes articles, but I wanted to note that you can't even get out of the 1st full paragraph without realizing how laughably stupid it is
9) Turkey is a major geopolitical adversary & is currently fighting 3 proxy wars against Iran: Syria, Yemen, & Azerbaijan. Why would they be funneling billions of $$$ to them? It's moronic. So we can establish it's a smear piece, not a serious article https://t.co/UEgLbURJR8
10) The
@nytimes
article was designed to drop on the same day as articles in other publications. For example, this Vox Media-owned
@NYMag
article which references the
@nytimes
article. An obvious sign of coordination. https://t.co/tX2ZSO66qH
11) Go grab the URL of the
@NYMag
article and do a Twitter search and look at the Blue Checkmark Brigade that is pushing the article out in line step
https://t.co/MfMRze2ASE
12) Of course you've got writers for
@Slate
jumping in to help push out the story, too. https://t.co/DVE55mdVBJ
13)
@Slate
by the way, ran their own hit piece on Turkey the day before, helping to lay the groundwork for the disinformation campaign. They're not about to sit this hoax out! https://t.co/9aly1WSUvi
14) Vox reporter and committed Russia Collusion hoaxster
@atrupar
Also got into the game with an attempted "quid pro quo" redirect https://t.co/pH62FUSGuk
15) Because when you when you've been pushing a conspiracy theory this stupid for this long, you're kinda pot committed
https://t.co/c7IGI8zi3K
16) Of course we can't overlook the author of the
@NYMag
article himself,
@jonathanchait https://t.co/p4lIMPCgMT
17)
@jonathanchait
was vital in planting the seeds of the original Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax. Chait wrote one of the earliest FusionGPS-planted stories in Apr 2016 claiming Putin had somehow compromised Trump.
https://t.co/j2yMcv6C30
18) Chait was also the "useful idiot" for FusionGPS who planted the "Trump changed the RNC platform on Ukraine to help Putin" narrative.

These stories were cited in other stories later on and used by the FBI to obtain FISA warrants on the Trump Campaign. https://t.co/AYNbxxIRvK
19) The same pattern has been playing out for a while in 2020, this time in relation to Turkey

@TWPundit first discovered a disinformation campaign was underway to illicitly connect Trump to Turkey when articles like this began dropping earlier this year https://t.co/BKqS9wJzGi
20) The Soros-funded
@OCCRP was the same media outfit cited in the fake Ukraine "whistleblower" complaint used by @AdamSchiff to kick off his Ukraine Impeachment hoax.
The Sep 2020 @OCCRP
article still reports the Ukraine accusations as established fact
https://t.co/vHBTjOckCK
21)
@BuzzFeed
( who infamously released the Steele Dossier) then got in on the act along with
@ICIJorg
... another collection of Soros-funded stooges (there's that name again 🤨) https://t.co/oeKFa6BUWt
22)
@BuzzFeed
gaslit their followers into thinking they'd really found something. But as
@TWPundit
reported, it was just recycled, made up dirt. Fake new.

Classic #RussiaGate pattern of circular reasoning … plant the story and then cite the story. https://t.co/8EdnnCbSus
23) It wasn't just Soros-funded alphabet soup orgs and rags like @Buzzfeed
@NBCNews did their part to help lay the groundwork for the @nytimes (sadly transparent and predictable) smear piece yesterday. https://t.co/jlIFJBBcvU
24) This article too was transparently absurd because it made reference to possible violations of the "Emoluments Clause" of the US Constitution ... which would fall in the same category as the Logan Act

Even @NBCNews recognized the stupidity of the charge and quickly retracted
25) The 9/27 @nytimes article on Trump's illegally leaked tax return was itself part of the setup. There were numerous accusations related to Turkey in the original article which are again referenced in the article from yesterday. https://t.co/7bsEnoG5hu. Stay tuned for more...

More from Politics

So let's see a show of hands: how many of you even knew Huber was digging into the Clinton Foundation? While he was assisting Horowitz in his digging into the FISC/Steele Dossier/Fusion GPS/Perkins Coie/DNC/Hillary campaign stuff?


I'm sure Huber is coming to DC *only* to discuss Clinton Foundation things with Meadows and his committee.

He for certain, like, won't be huddling with Horowitz or that new guy, Whitaker while he's in town. That would NEVER HAPPEN. [wink wink wink!] 😉

I just spent a year and a half telling you they will SHOW YOU what they are REALLY DOING when they are READY.

Not before.

No matter how much whining is done about it.

I'm exhausted but it's worth it.

Now you know why they're f**king TERRIFIED of Whitaker, the closer tapped by Trump to come in late for the hysterical fireworks that will ensue soon.

Look who's suddenly fund raising for his legal defen- er, I mean, ha ha - his reelection campaign!

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Trading view scanner process -

1 - open trading view in your browser and select stock scanner in left corner down side .

2 - touch the percentage% gain change ( and u can see higest gainer of today)


3. Then, start with 6% gainer to 20% gainer and look charts of everyone in daily Timeframe . (For fno selection u can choose 1% to 4% )

4. Then manually select the stocks which are going to give all time high BO or 52 high BO or already given.

5. U can also select those stocks which are going to give range breakout or already given range BO

6 . If in 15 min chart📊 any stock sustaing near BO zone or after BO then select it on your watchlist

7 . Now next day if any stock show momentum u can take trade in it with RM

This looks very easy & simple but,

U will amazed to see it's result if you follow proper risk management.

I did 4x my capital by trading in only momentum stocks.

I will keep sharing such learning thread 🧵 for you 🙏💞🙏

Keep learning / keep sharing 🙏
@AdityaTodmal
TradingView isn't just charts

It's much more powerful than you think

9 things TradingView can do, you'll wish you knew yesterday: 🧵

Collaborated with @niki_poojary

1/ Free Multi Timeframe Analysis

Step 1. Download Vivaldi Browser

Step 2. Login to trading view

Step 3. Open bank nifty chart in 4 separate windows

Step 4. Click on the first tab and shift + click by mouse on the last tab.

Step 5. Select "Tile all 4 tabs"


What happens is you get 4 charts joint on one screen.

Refer to the attached picture.

The best part about this is this is absolutely free to do.

Also, do note:

I do not have the paid version of trading view.


2/ Free Multiple Watchlists

Go through this informative thread where @sarosijghosh teaches you how to create multiple free watchlists in the free


3/ Free Segregation into different headers/sectors

You can create multiple sections sector-wise for free.

1. Long tap on any index/stock and click on "Add section above."
2. Secgregate the stocks/indices based on where they belong.

Kinda like how I did in the picture below.
Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.

He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...


... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:


Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.

Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9


Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."

I wonder why...

Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x


Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.

Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq