"Music, Sense and Nonsense: Collected Essays and Lectures", por Alfred Brendel.

Capítulo: “Conversations - Talking to Brendel with Jeremy

Ya casi llegamos al final de este maravilloso libro. En esta sección, Brendel comparte varias entrevistas. La primera de ellas fue en 1972 con Jeremy Siepmann, músico, locutor, articulista y autor de varios libros sobre música.
Si bien después de 377 hojas ya tenemos una buena idea sobre las opiniones de de Brendel sobre la música y el quehacer musical, en esta entrevista revela varios puntos de vista.
Sobre si disfruta interpretar música, Brendel responde que sí, sobre todo en los últimos años, “when I’ve had the impression that much of what I do comes across. Of course, one very rarely knows if the right things come across)”.
Sobre si los intérpretes existen para vincular al compositor con el público, Brendel afirma que le interesa más la relación del intérprete con el compositor que con el público: “What fascinates me is to make sense of a piece of music while it sounds”.
Sobre si el intérprete debería “educar” a su público, Brendel considera que se debe hacer clarificar la pieza lo más posible. Pero si el público siente que el intérprete quiere educarlo, el caso está perdido. Si se quiere educar al público, este no debe siquiera darse cuenta.
Sobre si el análisis musical tiene algún valor al intérprete, si bien es necesario tener un sólido conocimiento musical, el intérprete no debe considerar el análisis musical como la llave al tipo de intuición que permite una gran interpretación.
“It was Schoenberg who said, in a letter, that formal analysis is often overrated because it shows how something is done, not what is done. This, from one of the supreme analysts, is something valuable, I think”.
Sobre si la música grabada y en vivo requieren ser escuchadas distintamente, Brendel considera que si bien existen ciertas diferencias básicas, en su caso mientras más progresaba en sus grabaciones, más trataba de tocar como si estuviera en un concierto ante un público.
“Many more concerts should be recorded and issued on disc, with all their imperfections and coughing and so on. As far as piano recordings are concerned, the over-refinement of our tools nowadays seems sometimes to be a disadvantage.”
Sobre si la gesticulación al interpretar tiene alguna función musical, Brendel considera sí la tiene. Cuando se vio en televisión por primera vez, se dio cuenta que sus gestos contradecían completamente lo que hacía y lo que quería hacer musicalmente.
“I then had a mirror made, a big standing mirror, which I put beside the piano, not really making me visible all the time, but always there; unconsciously, one noticed things. It helped me to co-ordinate what I wanted to suggest with my movements with what really come out”.
Sobre la relación con sus grabaciones, Brendel considera que son “a kind of offspring of which one can’t, unfortunately, say that one has to nurse them until they grow up and then forget them as soon as possible and let them lead their own live…
They lead their own lives at once, and are scarcely ever grown up! There’s always something infantile about a record, al least as far as the artist is concerned. Records are interesting to learn from but not always to enjoy”.
Sobre el escribir sobre música, Brendel considera que no se debe ser arrogante: “That may seem very irrelevant, but I think it’s very important. If one decides to talk about something as elusive as music…
… something which is so difficult to grasp in words without talking nonsense all the time and being imprecise to an enormous degree, and personal to a degree which is no use to anyone, then one has to be modest about it”.
Sobre intérpretes que intentan ser originales distorsionando lo que el compositor indica en la partitura, Brendel considera que es una tontería. “If one sheds new light on music, it should be the outcome of an effort, not the input!”
Sobre si ha considerado dirigir, si bien Brendel se interesa por la dirección y sus técnicas, e incluso se imagina a sí mismo dirigiendo, nunca lo haría: “I think I would be too shy to attempt to impose something on an orchestra without being completely professional”.
Sobre si pudiera cambiar algo en su vida profesional: "I don't know. So far I don't feel at all exploited. I play a lot, though not as much as some other people, but I play because I like it. I have a lot of other interests, of course for which time will always be too short".
@threadreaderapp unroll

More from Music

Open Question to fellow investors tracking Music Industry.

A business like Universal which controls more than 1/3rd of all published music globally is selling for less than 6x FY20 Sales.

Why are Indian businesses like Saregama / Tips selling for 11x, 20x their sales?

If I include all of the revenue generated by entire firm, its selling for ~4.5x FY20 Sales


Universal Listing Market Cap ~ 40 Billion USD
FY 20 Revenues ~ 8.87 B USD or 7.4B EUR

Catalogue of Music includes every international artist you can possibly name

Either Universal is grossly undervalued or Saregama/Tips are grossly overvalued.

https://t.co/aHzWSYtcUt


https://t.co/v0EMoCuYKX

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.