Hello Ma'am. Can you publish an article on SSC CGL'19 results? BJP is not right everywhere. As an editor, it's your responsibility to bring the attention of masses towards these issues too. Please look into the issue and write about the injustice we students are facing from SSC.

@UnSubtleDesi Well for starters, when modiji is talking about Digital India and all the other schemes, then why's an online exam, whose result normally takes 3-4 days to publish being stretched to 3 months, and that's just one of the 4 exams and document verification to be done to get a 1/n
@UnSubtleDesi post through SSC CGL. The whole process takes about 3 years (CGL'18 result has not been even finalised yet and it's 2021 already).
Now coming to the matter at hand (CGL'19), Tier 2 exam was conducted in 3 days for just 1,25,000 students. Why weren't the exams conducted in 2/n
@UnSubtleDesi a single day? And even if the exams were conducted on 3 dates, viz. 15,16and 18 November, why was the difference in difficulty level so huge? There is a process of normalization which equates the marks of the students based on the difficulty level of paper of a certain day, 3/n
@UnSubtleDesi but the paper on 18th was so easy that the whole algorithm just collapsed. Imagine the shock of the students when the saw the cutoff 528/600 in comparision to the cutoff of last year (433/600). Students who got 450 on 15th and 16th cleared this cutoff and students who got 556 4/n
@UnSubtleDesi 556 on 18th couldn’t (since their raw marks in Maths decreased when normalised). Just imagine getting 556/600 and not getting selected!! And on the top of that, the whole drama has increased many folds since SSC decided not to disclose the actual marks of students. 5/n
@UnSubtleDesi It said that it would publish it combined with the marks of Tier 3, creating more suspense and anxiety among students who were even qualified (including me). If the results came out on the basis of a cutoff, then marks have already been rewarded to the students, 6/n
@UnSubtleDesi why not show them now? They probably are going to show it in May mid or last just before the exams of CGL’20 so students don’t get any time to protest. The things I’ve mentioned here are just the tip of the iceberg. 7/n
@UnSubtleDesi Ma’am you have a HUUGE following, many people, and influential ones read what you write. Please raise this issue and help us get justice. Atleast respond so that we know that you listen to our problems and are willing to do some research on it. 8/n
@UnSubtleDesi I’m not against the government, anyone who goes through my tl can confirm that, but these are some genuine problems that needs to be addressed.
Thank You!!

More from India

You May Also Like

@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?