Let’s talk about ORGANIC.
Robert Paarlberg’s new book on the food system is out today, and here’s an excerpt.
He’s not a fan of organic, and he makes some good points but misses others.
Here we go.
Organic's biggest shortcoming is that you need more land to grow the same amount of food.
The yield penalty happens in almost every crop, in almost every study.
The gap could narrow with more research/varieties, but it won’t go away.
This has big, bad climate implications.
The second issue I have with organic, which Paarlberg shares, is that its basic criterion is naturalness.
Natural doesn’t mean safe, or even safer. A farming standard based on it forces farmers to sometimes use more dangerous, less effective tools.
On human health, there’s scant evidence that pesticide residues on conventional produce are harmful to consumers (though it’s possible farmworkers could be at risk).
What I don’t want is for folks who can’t afford organic to worry about feeding their kids conventional produce.
On the plus side, Paarlberg acknowledges that the organic standard has some real advantages for animal welfare.
This is why I buy organic animal products.
Many in the organic world would like more regs ensuring animals have decent lives.
