Ok. I’ve organized my thoughts about the revival of Six Days in Fallujah. I want to approach this through the lens of someone who was IN Fallujah during 2004-2005, during some of the worst urban combat US Forces have ever experienced.

Let’s get a few things out of the way: the invasion of Iraq was a war crime. Period. Argue otherwise and I’ll block you. Does that make myself and others who fought war criminals? No, of course not. Did individual soldiers and Marines commit war crimes? Absolutely.
I’m someone who is deeply proud of my service. I tried my hardest to conduct myself as humanely as possible. I’m also someone who was forced to do things I’m not proud of to survive. Taking lives should never be a point of pride.
Iraq was a failure of our own making. Not only did we invade illegally, we did it without a plan. The vast majority of the insurgency were disaffected Iraqi soldiers without a job after we broke apart their military, not religious fanatics.
Yes, groups like AQI showed up to fight, but they came after we handed them a major propaganda victory by showing up in the first place and turning PMCs like Blackwater loose. There was little to no cultural sensitivity training.
Many Marines and soldiers turned the honorific title “Haji” into a term used to describe insurgents and criminals. I’ll be bluntly honest with you: I did it too. I was a different person back then. I was a kid.
We made strings of promises to innocent Iraqi civilians to get them to work for us as interpreters and sources. We plied them promises of US citizenship. We broke most of those promises. I’ve spoken of this before.
Ultimately, we were the bad guys in many scenarios there. If that upsets you, good. It upsets me. There ARE justifications for war. But there are NEVER good reasons for one. We did not have a justification for Iraq. That makes us a hostile occupier.
Which brings us to Six Days in Fallujah. This was originally billed as a third person survival horror game about one soldier trying to get out of Fallujah. It promised to depict OIF as it actually was: a horror story. I was apprehensive, but intrigued.
Of course it was shelved and now eleven years later, it’s back as a tactical first person shooter with the specter of the DoD behind it, which really worries me.
US Army recruitment is at an all time low, which is one hell of a coincidence. From America’s Army to Army eSports, the military had a proven track record of using games as recruitment tools.
The people behind this new iteration of the game promise to depict the “true” experience of soldiers, Marines, and Iraqi civilians. But does anyone actually believe that? I don’t.
That trailer was nothing like the original concept or what’s been promised since. It’s just more flag-waving, Americans-as-liberators nonsense. I’m sure the game will regale us with tales of noble sacrifice and grateful Iraqi citizens.
When really it should depict frightened kids fighting in a war they don’t fully understand, private contractors looking for slaughter, and dead Iraqi children.
That’s not to say there weren’t acts of compassion, sacrifice, and heroism by US troops. Of course there were; I’ve seen some. The majority of those there were decent men and women who didn’t really want to be there at all.
But if you REALLY want an accurate experience, you’ll depict the outstanding courage and fortitude of the Iraqi people who worked with us, fought with us, and died with us. Because of us. They deserved much, much better than we gave them. We still haven’t apologized.
Now do I think it’s possible to do this the right way? I really do. Do I trust the devs to do it the right way? Absolutely not. I’m already pretty confident about the end result.
Understand this: every American failure, every one, is borne of a lack of foresight. Of not thinking about the consequences. There’s no better example than that of the US, the Soviet Union, and Afghanistan in 1989.
After Congressman Charlie Wilson had (very rightfully) persuaded Congress and multiple other nations to provide billions of dollars in arms to the Mujahideen to repel the murderous Soviet Army, CIA case officer Gust Avrokotos was on a balcony with Charlie.
Gust asked Wilson if he knew the story about the Zen Master. Charlie said no, and Gus told the story.
The Zen Master observes the people of his village celebrating a young boy's new horse as a gift, and they say “oh, how wonderful!” The Zen Master says, “We'll see”.
When the boy falls off the horse and breaks a leg, everyone says “oh how terrible, the horse was a curse”. "We'll see," says the Zen Master.
Then war breaks out, and all the young men go off to fight except for the boy, who can’t because of his injury. Everyone now thinks the horse is a gift again and they say “oh how wonderful!”.

The Zen Master says, “We’ll see”.

Do you understand?
I’ll talk more about this on @officialSDGC tonight at 9pm EST.

More from For later read

You May Also Like

I like this heuristic, and have a few which are similar in intent to it:


Hiring efficiency:

How long does it take, measured from initial expression of interest through offer of employment signed, for a typical candidate cold inbounding to the company?

What is the *theoretical minimum* for *any* candidate?

How long does it take, as a developer newly hired at the company:

* To get a fully credentialed machine issued to you
* To get a fully functional development environment on that machine which could push code to production immediately
* To solo ship one material quanta of work

How long does it take, from first idea floated to "It's on the Internet", to create a piece of marketing collateral.

(For bonus points: break down by ambitiousness / form factor.)

How many people have to say yes to do something which is clearly worth doing which costs $5,000 / $15,000 / $250,000 and has never been done before.
Assalam Alaiki dear Sister in Islam. I hope this meets you well. Hope you are keeping safe in this pandemic. May Allah preserve you and your beloved family. I would like to address the misconception and misinterpretation in your thread. Please peruse the THREAD below.


1. First off, a disclaimer. Should you feel hurt by my words in the course of the thread, then forgive me. It’s from me and not from Islam. And I probably have to improve on my delivery. And I may not quote you verbatim, but the intended meaning would be there. Thank You!

2. Standing on Imam Shafii’s quote: “And I never debated anyone but that I did not mind whether Allah clarified the truth on my tongue or his tongue” or “I never once debated anyone hoping to win the debate; rather I always wished that the truth would come from his side.”

3. Okay, into the meat (my love for meat is showing. Lol) of the thread. Even though you didn’t mention the verse that permitted polygamy, everyone knows the verse you were talking about (Q4:3).


4. Your reasons for the revelation of the verse are strange. The first time I came across such. I had to quickly consult the books on the exegeses or tafsir of the Quran written by renowned specialists!
MASTER THREAD on Short Strangles.

Curated the best tweets from the best traders who are exceptional at managing strangles.

• Positional Strangles
• Intraday Strangles
• Position Sizing
• How to do Adjustments
• Plenty of Examples
• When to avoid
• Exit Criteria

How to sell Strangles in weekly expiry as explained by boss himself. @Mitesh_Engr

• When to sell
• How to do Adjustments
• Exit


Beautiful explanation on positional option selling by @Mitesh_Engr
Sir on how to sell low premium strangles yourself without paying anyone. This is a free mini course in


1st Live example of managing a strangle by Mitesh Sir. @Mitesh_Engr

• Sold Strangles 20% cap used
• Added 20% cap more when in profit
• Booked profitable leg and rolled up
• Kept rolling up profitable leg
• Booked loss in calls
• Sold only


2nd example by @Mitesh_Engr Sir on converting a directional trade into strangles. Option Sellers can use this for consistent profit.

• Identified a reversal and sold puts

• Puts decayed a lot

• When achieved 2% profit through puts then sold