THREAD: I've helped 200+ startups grow their newsletters.

Email marketing tactics ๐Ÿ‘‡

People reflexively ignore welcome emails after signup.

โ€ข Delay welcome emails by 45min to bypass this reflex

โ€ข Send the email from a personโ€”not the business. Julian Shapiro is more human than https://t.co/8y68CQzBOR

โ€ข Use unique subjects:
๐Ÿ‘Ž Welcome
๐Ÿ‘ Grammerly = Bye Typos
Make it seamless to refer

โ€ข Remind readers at the end of each issue that they can refer others. Include a link.

โ€ข Have a web version of every issue so they can be easily shared outside of email

โ€ข Consider rewards: Send a monthly bonus issue for referring 5 friends
SEO can be a vanity metric if it doesn't convert to leads.

โ€ข Offer readers quizzes to identify the best products for them. Require an email to see results.

โ€ข Create Buyer's Guides: Make PDFs with nice visuals to help readers learn skills. Require an email.
When pitching your newsletter on your site:

โ€ข Show a sample issue on the page. Prove how high quality your content is.

โ€ข Give them control over how often they get emailed. Some want weekly, but others REALLY want monthly. High volume can burn you and your readers out.
For some startups, non-payment causes up to 50% of churn.

โ€ข When a card fails, retry it. 20% of payments are resolved on attempt #2.

โ€ข No work? Email customers a mobile-friendly link w/ no password needed to update the card.

โ€ข No response? Send an SMS
I ran a Twitter poll asking what percentage of the newsletters people subscribe to do they get fatigued of.

Answer? 80%.

Suggestion: Consider sending fewer emails. Make each really count.
After newsletter signup, send subscribers a sample issue:

Piece together your best content from past issues into a super-issue.

This gets them anticipating your next issue, and it makes them less likely to insta-unsubscribe once they get it.
Make emails funโ€”not just educational.

Consider injecting a few memes, jokes, or interesting links from around the web.

Give readers a dopamine hit upon opening your email.
When pitching Twitter followers to become newsletter subscribers, two ideas:

โ€ข Obvious: Link in your bio.

โ€ข Less obvious: Cut a tweet thread short and tell people to subscribe for the rest of the thread's insights.
Recap:

โ€ข Make referring seamless.
โ€ข Consider sending fewer emails.
โ€ข Send a super-issue upon signup.

Follow for more fun growth tactics:

https://t.co/aDhPocOLgK

More from Julian Shapiro

More from All

๐™Ž๐™๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ข๐™ฎ ๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™จ๐™™๐™ค๐™ข ๐‘พ๐’๐’'๐’• ๐’ƒ๐’† ๐’”๐’–๐’“๐’‘๐’“๐’Š๐’”๐’†๐’… ๐’Š๐’‡ ๐’•๐’๐’Ž๐’๐’“๐’“๐’๐’˜ ๐’– ๐’“๐’†๐’‚๐’… ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐’”๐’‚๐’Ž๐’† ๐’”๐’•๐’–๐’‡๐’‡ ๐’Š๐’ 50๐’Œ ๐’˜๐’๐’“๐’Œ๐’”๐’‰๐’๐’‘ ๐’๐’“ ๐’”๐’๐’Ž๐’†๐’๐’๐’† ๐’Ž๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’๐’ˆ ๐’š๐’๐’–๐’“ ๐’Ž๐’๐’๐’†๐’š ๐’˜๐’Š๐’•๐’‰ ๐’”๐’‚๐’Ž๐’† ๐’๐’๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’„
Simple and effective way 2 make Money


Idea 1:- Use pivot level like 14800 in case of nifty and sell 14800straddle monthly expiry (365+335) exit if nifty closes on daily basis below S1 or above R1

After closing below S1 if it closes above S1 next day or any day enter the same position again vice versa for R1

Idea2:- Use R1 and S1 corresponding strikes multiple
Incase of R1 15337 take 15300ce
N in case of S1 14221 use 14200pe
Sell both and hold till expiry or exit if nifty closes below S1 or above R1 around closing
If the same bounces above S1 and falls below R1 re-enfer same strikes

Use same criteria for nifty, usdinr and banknifty

(This is must)Use this margin rule for 1lot banknifty pair keep 4Lax margin
For nifty one lot keep 3Lax
For usdinr 100lots keep 4Lax

I bet you if you do this on consistent basis your ROI will be more than 70% on yearly basis.

Couldn't explain easier than this

Criticisms are most welcomed.

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thingโ€”physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?