1/ I am seeing more and more founder secondary in venture rounds (Secondary = founders selling some of their shares before some other shareholders are able). Series B-D. I see both as an investor and through entrepreneur circles.

2/ I like secondary for entrepreneurs. Moderation is key but in a lot of situations I think it helps accelerate the co. Lots of very smart investors disagree. Here are my thoughts.
3/ Magnitude: My basic rule of thumb from what I see is market is 4+ yrs and up to 10% of founder’s equity stake with some $ cap that makes sense given stage etc. (typically <$10m)
4/ The entrepreneurial journey is brutally hard. Giving some financial relief helps remove one piece of pressure. I don’t think that secondary in the magnitude mentioned impacts the drive/persistence of great entrepreneurs.
5/ That secondary means they will be able to just sleep knowing they can pay their kids’ tuition. Secondary will make most founders better at their jobs, thus accelerating the co.
6/ For many entrepreneurs they have 98% of their net worth tied up in the startup. That risk- after several years- can make a founder scared. The daily ups/down create a rollercoaster that at first is difficult but overtime can be unbearable when there is no safety net.
7/ Those founders that were going to check out mentally because they sold 10% of their stake weren’t going to lead the co. anyway. If you’re concerned about that as the investor, you may not trust their motivation period. There is a bigger conversation you need to have.
8/ Let’s be clear. There are some brutal stories about secondary.
https://t.co/bPyDqUTWHh
9/ Those stories also make it pretty scary for entrepreneurs to talk about this with their investors or with other entrepreneurs. They are scared they will be judged (“why does that CEO get to take out $ before investors or other team members?”).
10/ Communicate with the board: I know it is scary. The subject is Taboo. But you’re all adults and it’s time to have a Big Boy/Big Girl. conversation. Communicate far in advance of the proposed round.

Btw- some VCs hate secondary. Passionately.

Buckle up.
11/ Protect the company first: If the Co. needs $5m and you can only get demand for $5m. That $5m needs to go to the company. It’s your job to raise the $ outside of what the company needs.
12/ Learn QSBS: Find an entrepreneur that got her shares counted as QSBS. Then get her accountant. If you don’t spend hours learning about this you may be burning your own personal money in a dumpster.
https://t.co/BpaVTXALNe
13/ Demand: You need to get a lot of demand to justify a secondary. Many investors/board members will want you to raise more than your model suggests to provide a cushion. Then your secondary will usually come after that.
14/ Structure: Investors often hate buying common which makes finding a buyer hard. Sometimes the founder can convince board to convert the common they are selling into preferred (thus price paid to founder is higher). Usually investor ends up buying the common.
15/ Pricing: If common is purchased it is for a lower price than preferred. That price varies on stage/performance of co, pref stack and founders ability to negotiate. I see 15-35% discount from preferred to common typical.
16/ Be tight & honest about your motivation: Worried about risk? Need money for kids tuition? Just be direct, consistent and honest about your motivations. Investors & the board will ask- be prepared.
17/ Decide who else gets to join the party: If the founder is feeling this way, likely some other (longer-tenured) team members might be feeling similarly. How many will you allow in, at what $ level? Impacts uses of cash for the sale.
18/ Note- there are tricky legal restrictions on how many people are allowed to sell (or be given offer to sell). Need to talk to your lawyer first.
19/ Who doesn’t get to go to the dance: Think about implication on shareholders that aren’t being given offer to sell.
20/ Who are the buyers: Remember they are your cap table going forward. Think hard about who you want in your company. Vision, mission, communication, values alignment is key.

I’ve screwed up who we took on as an investor before and it really sucks.
21/ Don’t be an idiot with the money: Think about the implications of the red Ferrari before you buy the red Ferrari.
22/ Founder secondary shouldn't be a top 20 issue as an entrepreneur, but it is one that gets personal quickly. When it comes up it matters a lot but is super hard to talk about.
23/ Probably worth mentioning- founder liquidity used to happen a bit earlier in the lifecycle when companies would stay private for a shorter period, companies would sell earlier.
24/ Also- to quote an investor I like: You can’t truly unlock the potential of the business until it’s bigger than any one (or small collection) of incentives. You need to do right by it, not individual actors. More liquidity removes that from the equation.

More from All

ChatGPT is a phenomenal AI Tool.

But don't limit yourself to just ChatGPT.

Here're 8 AI-powered tools you should try in 2023:

1. KaiberAI

@KaiberAI helps you generate beautiful videos in minutes.

Transform your ideas into the visual stories of your dreams with this Amazing Tool.

New features:
1. Upload your custom music
2. Prompt Templates
3. Camera Movements:

Check here

https://t.co/ivnDRf628L


2. @tldview TLDV

Best ChatGPT Alternative for meetings.

Make your meetings 10X more productive with this amazing tool.

Try it now:

https://t.co/vOy3sS4QfJ


3. ComposeAI

Use ComposeAI for generating any text using AI.

It’s will help you write better content in seconds.

Try it here:

https://t.co/ksj5aop5ZI


4. Browser AI

Use this AI tool to extract and monitor data from any website.

Train a robot in 2 minutes to do your work.

No coding required.

https://t.co/nNiawtUMyO
APIs in general are so powerful.

Best 5 public APIs you can use to build your next project:

1. Number Verification API

A RESTful JSON API for national and international phone number validation.

🔗
https://t.co/fzBmCMFdIj


2. OpenAI API

ChatGPT is an outstanding tool. Build your own API applications with OpenAI API.

🔗 https://t.co/TVnTciMpML


3. Currency Data API

Currency Data API provides a simple REST API with real-time and historical exchange rates for 168 world currencies

🔗 https://t.co/TRj35IUUec


4. Weather API

Real-Time & historical world weather data API.

Retrieve instant, accurate weather information for
any location in the world in lightweight JSON format.

🔗 https://t.co/DCY8kXqVIK

You May Also Like

ARE WE FAMILIAR WITH THE MEANING & POWER OF MANTRAS WE CHANT?

Whenever we chant a Mantra in Sanskrit, it starts with 'Om' and mostly ends with 'Swaha' or 'Namaha'. This specific alignment of words has a specific meaning to it which is explained in Dharma Shastra.


Mantra is a Sanskrit word meaning sacred syllable or sacred word. But Mantras r not just words put together,they r also vibrations.The whole Universe is a cosmic energy in different states of vibration &this energy in different states of vibration forms the objects of Universe.

According to Scriptures,Om is considered to be ekaakshar Brahman,which means Om is the ruler of 3 properties of creator,preserver&destroyer which make the
https://t.co/lyhkWeCdtv is also seen as a symbol of Lord Ganesha, as when starting the prayer,it's him who is worshipped 1st.


'Om' is the sound of the Universe. It's the first original vibration of the nothingness through which manifested the whole Cosmos. It represents the birth, death and rebirth process. Chanting 'Om' brings us into harmonic resonance with the Universe. It is a scientific fact.

Therefore, Mantras are described as vibrational words that are recited, spoken or sung and are invoked towards attaining some very specific results. They make very specific sounds at a frequency that conveys a directive into our subconcious.
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x