It's infuriating to watch conservatives continue to misrepresent/misunderstand basic scientific findings for the purpose of portraying Trump as a genius. Once again, they're misrepresenting the findings of a study on hydroxychloroquine, putting out disinformation that harms.../1

...those who actually need the drug - people with autoimmune diseases like lupus and rheumatoid arthritis -by creating a run on the drug with their disinformation. Nothing has *ever* even suggested that hydroxy is a prophylactic that prevents COVID, that it keeps infected.../2
...people who are not hospitalized from getting worse or that any possible benefits outweigh the risks except for very severe situations where doctors do not need an uneducated reality TV star to tell them how to treat. The first, since retracted, study showed that with.../3
...people who were severely ill & hospitalized from COVID, with hydro and an antibiotic used in tandem, saw a decrease in the viral load. That was it. The meaning was next to nothing. It was based on a handful of people, observational. Trump took that, based on an tweet he.../4
...saw, and declared hydro to be a miracle cure, causing a mass rush from people who wanted to use it to prevent infection. Trump did not understand the difference between preventative (like a vaccine), treatment for bad cases (steroids, blood thinners) and remdesivir.../5
...a broad antiviral that has wider cohort that can benefit with lower risk than hydro. NO ONE ever said hydroxychloroquine has zero benefit. It has benefits that outweigh risks only in severe cases - people intubated having the kitchen sink thrown at them to increase their.../6
...chance of survival. A very very common outcome of COVID is myocarditis; hydro has an incidence of disruption of cardiac rhythm. You dont combine a disease that damages the heart with a drug that impedes the heart's functioning unless you absolutely have to. What the most.../7
...recent study - which was purely observational, thus of extremely limited value - found was that hydro decreased the chance of death for people who are already intubated. In other words - very little different than what we already knew. Real physicians didn't need..../8
...to hear from Dr. Trump - who doesn't know the difference between prophylactic, treatment and rescue drugs - to tell them how to use drugs. The problem was, is, & always will be when people who know nothing about medicine, who don't read the damn studies & don't understand.../9
...the studies when they read them, and are more concerned with proving their ignorance correct than in actually helping people, dance around proclaiming they are experts. Here is all I know: How to read a medical study, because I was taught how to. Trump sees a tweet, and.../10
...screams "miracle drug!" and Fox News and the rest of the hallelujah chorus start repeating it ad nauseum.

Hydroxychloroquine does NOT prevent COVID. There is nothing, other than Trump and Fox, suggesting it does. There is NOTHING suggesting it does anything for cases..../11
...that don't require hospitalization. Because of its risk, it is not used as a 1st, 2nd or even 3d line drug for people who are hospitalized with COVID. It *might* have some benefit for people who have been put on a respirator, but the evidence is far weaker than for other.../12
...drugs, and the anecdotal evidence we have from limited groups shows solely that there might be a lower death rate from the cohort of people on deaths door. And again, the time to decide when this is something that might be worthwhile is up to doctors, not Trump and Fox.../13
..we continue to deal with the consequences of having a malignant narcissist as president who thought his job was to announce miracle cures rather than support scientists who could save us. Yet he & the hallelujah chorus keep attacking experts while advancing their snake oil../15
...treatments based on research they dont understand, dont read and dont care to understand.

People with lupus and arthritis are suffering. All because Cheeto Mussolini wants to pretend he is anything other than an uneducated fool.

end

More from Kurt Eichenwald

More from All

#தினம்_ஒரு_திருவாசகம்
தொல்லை இரும்பிறவிச் சூழும் தளை நீக்கி
அல்லல் அறுத்து ஆனந்தம் ஆக்கியதே – எல்லை
மருவா நெறியளிக்கும் வாதவூர் எங்கோன்
திருவாசகம் என்னும் தேன்

பொருள்:
1.எப்போது ஆரம்பித்தது என அறியப்படமுடியாத தொலை காலமாக (தொல்லை)

2. இருந்து வரும் (இரும்)


3.பிறவிப் பயணத்திலே ஆழ்த்துகின்ற (பிறவி சூழும்)

4.அறியாமையாகிய இடரை (தளை)

5.அகற்றி (நீக்கி),

6.அதன் விளைவால் சுகதுக்கமெனும் துயரங்கள் விலக (அல்லல் அறுத்து),

7.முழுநிறைவாய்த் தன்னுளே இறைவனை உணர்த்துவதே (ஆனந்த மாக்கியதே),

8.பிறந்து இறக்கும் காலவெளிகளில் (எல்லை)

9.பிணைக்காமல் (மருவா)

10.காக்கும் மெய்யறிவினைத் தருகின்ற (நெறியளிக்கும்),

11.என் தலைவனான மாணிக்க வாசகரின் (வாதவூரெங்கோன்)

12.திருவாசகம் எனும் தேன் (திருவா சகமென்னுந் தேன்)

முதல்வரி: பிறவி என்பது முன்வினை விதையால் முளைப்பதோர் பெருமரம். அந்த ‘முன்வினை’ எங்கு ஆரம்பித்தது எனச் சொல்ல இயலாது. ஆனால் ‘அறியாமை’ ஒன்றே ஆசைக்கும்,, அச்சத்துக்கும் காரணம் என்பதால், அவையே வினைகளை விளைவிப்பன என்பதால், தொடர்ந்து வரும் பிறவிகளுக்கு, ‘அறியாமையே’ காரணம்

அறியாமைக்கு ஆரம்பம் கிடையாது. நமக்கு ஒரு பொருளைப் பற்றிய அறிவு எப்போதிருந்து இல்லை? அதைச் சொல்ல முடியாது. அதனாலேதான் முதலடியில், ஆரம்பமில்லாத அஞ்ஞானத்தை பிறவிகளுக்குக் காரணமாகச் சொல்லியது. ஆனால் அறியாமை, அறிவின் எழுச்சியால், அப்போதே முடிந்து விடும்.

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.