I see a trend on SM of retail investors trying to copy stock ideas of those whom they view as knowledgeable investors. Please DO NOT do this. Do your own research & build/follow your own process. Buying a business on borrowed conviction is a terrible idea. 1/n

If you’re lucky, you’ll end up copying someone like @ishmohit1 or @itsTarH who are open about their thesis/anti-thesis pointers and entry & exit from a position. If you’re unlucky you might end getting manipulated or left with outdated info about someone’s invested position. 2/n
Either way, u cannot clone someone’s conviction, which is why you’ll never get their results. Better 2 make modest returns with conviction based on ur own research, instead of trying to clone others. Network, share ideas, data & views. But say NO 2 copy-pasting stock ideas. 3/n
If you respect & r impressed by someone, please study their process. Copy the parts that work for you. In the end, you get the results that you’ve earned. Taking the lazy approach of बस stock बता दो will never make you wealthy. Invest in yourself & the results will follow 4/n

More from Wise investing

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.