so it's probably like a miniaturized 386 running ROM-DOS.
gonna get in line for the vaccine because I've heard all these urban legends about tracking microchips
and I think I might be able to root it and install Doom
"well, the bad news is that you've got the virus. I'm sorry..."
"and the good news?"
"well..."
*at doom's gate starts faintly playing from my lungs*
https://t.co/6QFwNCdTpD
https://t.co/R8Z6lDUKMy
all I can do is unlock the mode that turns everyone into femboy catgirl maids. USELESS, I SAY!
https://t.co/o8WEx2hPpK
they want you to keep doing this wearing medical face mask because eventually they are going to try and make you do this cyber punks pic.twitter.com/6aWs7nlhfa
— reactions (@reactjpg) July 24, 2020
FACIAL RECOGNITION
Try to build a grand unified set up moon landing and/or JFK conspiracies sometime, for example.
https://t.co/jruIWAQQ0P
my DMs are open
Robert Heinlein's The Puppet Masters.
meanwhile, in the real world, it's just "wear a mask" and BOY HAS THERE BEEN SOME PUSHBACK AGAINST THAT
the far off future of 2007
we were SO SURE the future was gonna be amazing.
It came out 5 years before the movie, and 3 years before the book, and takes a very different tone.
https://t.co/TGsdUhG0dh
is this the one? pic.twitter.com/la2brHNVjs
— moon moon \U0001f338 (@DoomishFox) January 14, 2021
https://t.co/tuLTPayc7u
one of those? pic.twitter.com/ye0Sevlg13
— \U0001f1f2\U0001f1eb minirop \U0001f1ec\U0001f1e7 (@minirop) January 14, 2021
More from foone
More from Society
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?