Do with your own. Don’t pay them.
There is a supertrend indicator in zerodha. For swing go with 60 min chart. Check with different numbers in period and multiplier section.
Check success rate of buy and sell signal generated by system. Apply number according to decide buy and sell for swing trade.
More from Mitesh Patel
https://t.co/YqesIdZDQ2\u2026
— Naveen sharma (@learner_naveen) June 14, 2021
Here is the link to the book aka copiled tweets of @Mitesh_Engr sir @_GauravVashisth @ITRADE191 Sir
Anyone can download and use it for free.
If again hit then exit straddle and create new straddle with same procedure.
it will consolidate between 32000-32200 or 32100 to 32300 and u will get theta decay.
— Mitesh Patel (@Mitesh_Engr) May 15, 2021
This is for normal move. Sudden big move may come anytime. So keep SL in system.
If u r selling at 350-350 then keep SL in system 475 for both legs.
Practice it. No need to attend webinar.
How I am playing expiry trades.
Catch me if you can @Mitesh_Engr
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) July 17, 2021
Time for a\U0001f9f5
Mitesh Sir's EXPIRY Option Selling 101:
\u2022 What to look for?
\u2022 Strike Selection & Ratios
\u2022 SL mgmt
\u2022 Avoiding freezes
\u2022 Monthy Expiry
\u2022 Event days
\u2022 How he would have traded last expiry?
In collaboration with @AdityaTodmal pic.twitter.com/9uN2vQQ4hc
More from Screeners
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?