#SoliSorabjee
Virtual meeting to condole passing of Indian jurist and former Attorney General for India, Soli Sorabji
Lalit Bhasin, President of SILF: The law reports are full of the monumental cases in which Soli appeared... during his seven-decade tenure as a lawyer.
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
The allegation that he had taken a bribe was sufficient to dismiss the government in a State, Venugopal recalls.
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
The next he heard was that Sorabjee had passed away because of COVID.
AG: Obviously, he did not want to exhaust me or Pinky...
#SoliSorabjee
Nariman: Permit me to add a footnote to these rich tributes
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
Nariman: Once long ago a Senior Advocate of the Bombay High Court walked in (to the chambers of Jamshedji Kanga).. Jahangir ji, that was his first name, had come to see Jamshedji for a somewhat delicate matter.
#SoliSorabjee
Jahangir, looked at us again, sheepishly said, 82
Jamshedji, aged 92, shot back at him "With one leg in the grave, what are you commiserating about your future?"
Jamshedji, however, would still meticulously came to the chamber but made no appearances, after 80.
Nariman: This was his story the last time we met.
#SoliSorabjee
Sorabji, he recounted, said, "But I have to be convinced, if I am not convinced I am not going to argue."
@vikassinghSrAdv
#SoliSorabjee
Singh adds that he learnt, from this experience, the principle, "Before you start arguing, you have to be convinced yourself."
@vikassinghSrAdv
#SoliSorabjee
@KapilSibal
#SoliSorabjee
@KapilSibal
#SoliSorabjee
@KapilSibal
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
Salve: I said I have a lot of oil in me, please feel free to do that
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
#SoliSorabjee
More from Bar & Bench
More from Law
This issue was repeatedly highlighted bu Judge Totenberg:
Dominion’s system “does not produce a voter-verifiable paper ballot or a paper ballot marked with the voter’s choices in a format readable by the voter because the votes are tabulated solely from the unreadable QR code.”
Judge also found that Dominion's QR codes are NOT encrypted:
“Evidence plainly contradicts any contention that the QR codes or digital signatures are encrypted,”
This was “ultimately conceded by Mr. Cobb and expressly acknowledged later by Dr. Coomer during his testimony.”
Judge Totenberg said there was “demonstrable evidence” that the implementation of Dominion’s systems by Georgia placed voters at an “imminent risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote,” which she defined as a “vote that is accurately counted.”
Judge Totenberg found that Dominion Systems inherently could not be audited.
She noted that auditors are severely limited and “can only determine whether the BMD printout was tabulated accurately, not whether the election outcome is correct.“
Totenberg stated in her ruling that a BMD printout “is not trustworthy” and the application of an Risk-Limiting audit (RLA) to an election that used BMD printouts “does not yield a true risk-limiting audit.”
Georgia used RLAs to claim no fraud...
Dominion’s system “does not produce a voter-verifiable paper ballot or a paper ballot marked with the voter’s choices in a format readable by the voter because the votes are tabulated solely from the unreadable QR code.”
Witness explaining that on electronic ballots (QR code ballots), it's impossible to determine voter intent. The machine decides the intent, whereas, with paper ballots, a human can double-check the ballot. https://t.co/kkhamio2Je
— The Election Wizard (@Wizard_Predicts) December 30, 2020
Judge also found that Dominion's QR codes are NOT encrypted:
“Evidence plainly contradicts any contention that the QR codes or digital signatures are encrypted,”
This was “ultimately conceded by Mr. Cobb and expressly acknowledged later by Dr. Coomer during his testimony.”
Judge Totenberg said there was “demonstrable evidence” that the implementation of Dominion’s systems by Georgia placed voters at an “imminent risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote,” which she defined as a “vote that is accurately counted.”
Judge Totenberg found that Dominion Systems inherently could not be audited.
She noted that auditors are severely limited and “can only determine whether the BMD printout was tabulated accurately, not whether the election outcome is correct.“
Totenberg stated in her ruling that a BMD printout “is not trustworthy” and the application of an Risk-Limiting audit (RLA) to an election that used BMD printouts “does not yield a true risk-limiting audit.”
Georgia used RLAs to claim no fraud...