When Jacob Rees Mogg threw dead fish into the Thames at WETminster, I thought, like most of you, he was making a point on behalf of the Fishing INDUSTRY.

It was only yesterday that we all learned he was acting on behalf of the FISH.

Fish happiness, not Brexit, was the goal!

In the year before #Brexit started -
(note: Brexit was not done, it's just begun)
- I worried about those most impacted.

My logic was while those wishing to remain would be most disappointed, they would also be most prepared.

#BrexitDeal would hurt its supporters.
Starting ☝️
Two reasons were anticipated.

1. Famously the economic consequences would hurt Leave voters the most (albeit no one expected the madness of combining #Brexit with #Covid19)

2. Sovereignty and independence would be reversed; we'd end up with less of both (as we have).

Number 3?
We didn't spend enough time on No.3. Few anticipated only 15 days of #Brexit would be needed.

Also a dilemma. It would have needed remainers to be listened to. Or leavers to question #Brexit.

3. What happens: A small leave group realise the con; disagree with Leave Mainstream?
No 3: And now
Mogg boasts of having fish back while:

* The fishing industry is in arms; screaming betrayal
* Some fisheries are already bankrupting
* Because fish we can't sell is rotting

Yet Jake's happy the fish are happy.
Almost as if ☝️ he had nothing to do with this
Back when Jake 'there's something fishy about him' was campaigning for the Brexit he just initiated his stance varied.

I could be accused of believing it was just this sort of moment he was concerned about when he used to represent the now bankrupting⏬
https://t.co/efdaTMDD9R
Some of us have been pointing out the small flaws in Mr Mogg's logic for a while, just this sort of circumstance [https://t.co/7rtyBeDpJc]

But anticipating #Brexit flaws is easy as catching blind sloths.

The new game is WHAT BREXITERS DO to clean up the 💩 they laid.
Since #Brexitsnotdoneitsjustbegun the real test starts now.

Can the Brexiter machine, move on from

blaming everyone for anything while promising everything

=>

Delivering any promises?

When it comes to Mogg, I'm not neutral: Doubtful.
https://t.co/2aclI7HZ1p
After all, this is the guy who must have had this sort of data⏬ and yet willingly misrepresented it for years.

He turned a huge UK success story into an EU failure.

It's hard to turn that psychology into a diligent concerned bureaucrat.

https://t.co/o8sCmfwjtX
Of course, he's not the only one.
Mr FARTage and countless others did this sort of cherry-picking all the time.

And people believed them.

But that simply reinforces the problem of NUMBER 3.

What happens now?
The options for our fishermen are easy to assess⏬

Sadly I fear the path is already chosen by leopards who can not now, or ever, change spots
Appendix.

There are lies
There are damned lies
There are statistics
And then the ERG

Beyond those there are lies that take you straight to Hell.

In Brexit, the reality reversal of British Fishing, from massive success to failure under EU was a Hell-Lie.
(Source link earlier)

More from Brexit

On this, I think it’s highly unlikely to occur in the timeframe given. For several reasons, I don’t think it’s realistic for Scotland to secede, and then join the EU, in 9 years.

For that, thanks goes to Brexit.

A thread because why not...


Two important dates: March 2016 and January 1st 2021.

Firstly, prior to the 2014 referendum, the Nationalists proposed a date of March 2016 to secede.

Secondly, today - the end completion of Brexit five-and-a-half years after Cameron’s majority in 2015.

Brexit has demonstrated many things, primarily that splitting unions is not easy. The UKs membership of the EU was 47 years and by the end it was not at the heart of the EU. The Union has existed for over 300 as a unitary state.

Dividing a unitary state, like the UK, will not be easy. Frankly, it will make Brexit look simple. Questions of debt, currency, defence, and more will need to be resolved ... something not addressed with Brexit.

Starting with debt. Scotland will end up with its proportionate share of the UKs national debt. It’s not credible to suggest otherwise. Negotiating what is proportionate won’t be easy when both sides disagree.

It’s importance will be seen shortly.

You May Also Like